摘要
"《刘子》刘勰著",南宋以前直接可见的公私著录均无疑义;分歧始自南宋出现的《刘子》袁孝政注本及刘克庄引文。考证表明,袁孝政注本乃宋人伪托,刘克庄引文亦无的据;无论外证还是内证,都充分证明《刘子》著作权当属刘勰。辨别《刘子》作者归属,深入研究《刘子》,对全面认识刘勰、深入研究《文心雕龙》,乃至建构中华文化新体系,都具有重要的学术价值和实际意义。
The opinion that Liu Zi was written by Liu Xie was never doubted in the visible official or private writings before the Southern Song Dynasty,but the doubt began from the annotated edition by Yuan Xiaozheng and research by Liu Kezhuang of the Southern Song Dynasty.Through the textual research,we know that the annotated edition by Yuan forgery by the Song people,and there is no conclusive evidence of the research by Liu Kezhuang either.That is to say,both internal and external evidence fully prove that the authorship of Liu Zi still belongs to Liu Xie.For a comprehensive understanding of Liu Xie,the deep studies of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons,and even for the construction of new system of Chinese culture,it is of great academic value to distinguish the authorship identification,as well as make intensive studies of Liu Zi.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期107-124,166,共18页
Literature,History,and Philosophy