期刊文献+

血流储备分数在多支血管病变患者中指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗疗效的荟萃分析 被引量:7

The meta-analysis of the value of fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with multivessel diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统地评价血流储备分数(FFR)与其他方法在多支血管病变患者中指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PIC)的疗效。方法利用关键词"血流储备分数或者FFR、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或者PCI、多支血管病变"的中英文检索中文数据库中国知网(CNKI)、万方和维普中文科技期刊数据库以及英文数据库Pubmed、EMBASE和Web of science中关于FFR指导PCI治疗多支血管病变的随机对照实验的文献。按照Jadad评分标准对纳入文献进行质量评价,利用Stata10.0进行荟萃分析。结果共有7篇英文文献,累计实验组2 024人,对照组7 284人纳入统计分析。与其他治疗方式相比,FFR指导PCI治疗多支血管病变发生心肌梗死的风险显著降低(RR=0.72,P=0.008);虽然患者出现死亡和主要心血管不良事件的风险也降低,但差异无统计学意义。结论 FFR指导PCI治疗多支血管病变是一种有效的治疗手段,但其是否适用于中国人群仍需要进一步验证。 Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with multivessel diseases treated by fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided percutaneous coronary intervention(PCD or other forms of treatment. Methods Some keywords inclu- ding FFR or fractional flow reserve, percutaneous coronary intervention or PCI, multivessel coronary artery disease were used to search randomized control trails(RCT),which compared outcomes of patients with multivessel disease treated by FFR guided PCI with other forms of treatment,in Chinese and English database including CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, Pubmed, EMBASE and the web of science. The quality of included studies was evaluated by Jadad quality score and all the data was analyzed by statal0.0. Results A total of 7 english literatures accumulating 2 024 cases in experimental group and 7 284 cases in control group were included in this study. Compared with other forms of treatment, patients with multivessel diseases treated by FFR-guided PCI had significantly low- er risk of myocardial infaretion(RR=0.72 ,P=0. 008). Although the risk of death and major adverse cardiovascular events were al- so be reduced, there were no statistically significant difference. Conclusion FFR-guided PCI is an effective treatment for multivessel disease, but it is still needs further verification for the application in Chinese population.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期823-825,共3页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 血流储备分数 心肌 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 血管病变 meta分析 fractional flow reserve, myocardial angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary vascular disease meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1林鸿,张戈.脂联素与冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病临床研究进展[J].医学综述,2012,18(3):354-356. 被引量:10
  • 2贾洪顺,刘磊,杨建明,全显跃.CT冠状动脉造影在冠心病诊断中的应用价值[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27(2):213-214. 被引量:28
  • 3罗俊,顾文娟,徐礼,李江.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相关性心肌梗死研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2011,32(5):666-671. 被引量:5
  • 4王林林,黄进.血流储备分数在冠状动脉介入策略选择中的应用价值[J].心血管病学进展,2010,31(4):521-524. 被引量:6
  • 5Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, etal. Assessing the qual- ity of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding nec- essary? [J]. Control Clin Trials,1996,17(1) :1-12.
  • 6Botman KJ,Pijls NH, Beeh JW, et al. Percutaneous coro-nary intervention or bypass surgery in multivessel dis- ease? A tailored approach based oncoronary pressure measurement, [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2004, 63(2):184-191. .
  • 7Berger A, Botman KJ, MaeCarthy PA, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided per- cutaneous coronary intervention in patients with mul- tivessel disease[J]. J Am Coll Carcliol, 2005,46 (3) : 438- 442.
  • 8Wongpraparut N, Yalamanchili V, Pasnoori V, et al. Thir- ty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary in- tervention[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2005,96 ( 7 ) .. 877-884.
  • 9Chamuleau SA, van Eck-Smit BL, Meuwissen M, et al. Long-term prognostic value of CFVR and FFR versus perfusion scintigraphy in patients with multivessel disease [J]. Neth Heart J,2007,15(11) :369-374.
  • 10Angkananard T, Wongpraparut N, Tresukoso[ D, et al. Fractional flow reserve guided coronary revascularization in drug-eluting era in Thai patients with borderline multi- vessel coronary stenoses[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2011,94 Suppl 1 $25-$32.

二级参考文献136

  • 1王怡宁,金征宇,孔令燕,张竹花,宋兰,张抒扬,张立仁,林松柏,王沄,赵文敏.64层与16层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像比较[J].中国医学科学院学报,2006,28(1):26-31. 被引量:44
  • 2孟冷,张兆琪,吕飙.64层螺旋CT在冠状动脉疾病诊断中的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(8):792-796. 被引量:129
  • 3王怡宁,金征宇,孔令燕,宋兰,张竹花,张抒扬,林松柏,牟文斌,王沄,赵文敏,郭家武.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(8):797-801. 被引量:99
  • 4Pijls NH,Son JA,Kirkeeide RL,et al.Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary,myocardial,and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty[J].Circulation,1993,87:1354-1367.
  • 5Pijls NH,Gelder BV,van der Voort P,et al.Fractional flow reserve-a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow[J].Circulation,1995,92:3183-3193.
  • 6Pijls NH,Bruyne BD,Peels K,et al.Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses[J].NEJM,1996,334:1703-1708.
  • 7Tobis J,Azarbal B,Slavin L.Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,49:839-848.
  • 8Pijls NH,Schaardenburgh P,Manoharan G,et al.Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis.5-year follow-up of the DEFER study[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,49:2105-2111.
  • 9Melikian N,Bondt PD,Cuisset T,et al.Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and MIBI SPECT:a comparison in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease[J].Circulation,2007,116:750-751.
  • 10Chamuleau SAJ,Meuwissen M,Koch KT,et al.Usefulness of fractional flow reserve for risk stratification of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and an intermediate stenosis[J].Am J Cardiol,2002,89(4):377-380.

共引文献51

同被引文献35

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部