期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

浅析Mazurkewich关于与格结构习得研究

Mazurkewich's Theory on the Acquisition of Dative Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章通过对Mazurkewich研究的反思,指出了其研究理论和实验的不足之处,尤其是在分析被试没有产生过度泛化的原因时,其忽略了一个重要的根本因素——感知突显。未来有关与格转换习得的研究,应充分结合标记性理论和感知突显因素。 According to the study on Mazurkewich＇ s theory, the inadequacy of the theory and experiment is pointed out. It is pointed out that perceptual salience is ignored when analy- zing the reason why the subject did not experience overgeneralization. Therefore, the following studies should consider markedness and perceptual salience. Moreover, it is also suggested to improve the experimental design to clarify the perceptual salience and complete markedness theory.
作者 孟繁
机构地区 西安外国语大学
出处 《哈尔滨学院学报》 2014年第3期124-126,共3页 Journal of Harbin University
关键词 与格动词 与格转换 过度泛化 感知突显 标记性理论 dative verbs dative form transformation overgeneralization perceptual sali-ence markedness
分类号 H314 [语言文字—英语]
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Mazurkewich. I. Acquisition of Dative Alternation by Second Language Learners and Linguistic Theory[J]. Language Learning, 1984, ( 34 ).
  • 2Mazurkewich. I. Syntactic Markedness and Language Acquisition[ J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisi- tion, 1985, (7).
  • 3Bardovi-Harlig. K. Markedness and Salience in Sec- ond-language Acquisition [ J l. Language Learning, 1987, (37).
  • 4Brown, R. , &C. Hanlon. Cognition and the Develop- ment of Language[ M ]. New York : John Wiley&Sons, 1970.
  • 5Fillmore. C. The Indirect Object Construction in Eng- lish and the Ordering of Transformations [ M ]. The Huge : Mouton, 1965.
  • 6Jackendoff. R. &P. Culicover. A Reconsideration of Dative Movements [ J ]. Foundations of Language, 1971 ,(7).
  • 7Jackendoff. R. Morphological and Semantic Regulari- ties in the Lexicon [ J ]. Language, 1975, ( 51 ).
  • 8Emonds. J. Evidence that Indirect Object Rule is a Structure-preserving Rule [ J ]. Foundations of Lan- guage, 1972, ( 8 ).
  • 9Oehrle. R. T. The Grammatical Status of the Dative Al- ternation in English [ M ]. Doctoral Dissertation. MIT, 1976.
  • 10Chomsky, N. Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar [ M ]. Pisa : Scula Normale Superiore, 1981.

二级参考文献8

  • 1蔡金亭.中国学生英语过渡语中的作格动词—一项实证研究[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(4):283-289. 被引量：51
  • 2?erlmutter,D. M. Impersonal Passives and the Unac- cusative Hypothesis[A]. In Proceedings of the Fourth nnual Meeting of the Berkely Linguistics Society [C ]. Berkely : Berkely Linguistics Society, 1978.
  • 3Burzio, L. Italian Syntax: A Government - binding Ap- proach [ M ]. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986.
  • 4Levin, B. , & Rappaport, M. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax - lexical Semantics Interface [M]. Cambridge Mass : MIT Press, 1995.
  • 5Ju, M. K. Overpassivization Errors by Second Lan- guage Learners:The Effect of Conceptualizable Agents in Diseourse[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisi- tion.2000. (22).
  • 6Oshita, H. What Is Happened May not Be What Ap- pears to Be Happening: A Corpus Study of "Passive" Unaccusatives in L2 English[ J ]. Second Language Research,2000, (4).
  • 7Yip, V. Interlanguage and Learnability: From Chinese to English Massachusetts [ M]. Harvard University Press, 1995.
  • 8Dixon,R. M. W. A New Approach to English Grammar on Semantic Principles [ M ]. Oxford : Clarend Press, 1991.
哈尔滨学院学报
2014年 第3期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部