中文版心理授权量表的修订

Revision of Chinese version of the Psychological Empowerment Scale

目的：修订可用于评价我国护理工作人员授权认知状况的中文版心理授权量表（ PES ）。方法在对原始PES进行翻译的基础上，选取6家医院通过专家评定和对750名护士的调查，对量表中存在的文化差异、量表的效度和信度进行分析评价，统计采用探索性因子分析、内容效度、Cronbach ’ s α系数和条目内容相关性分析。结果共发放问卷750份，有效回收710份，有效回收率为94．7％。中文版PES的4个因子是合理的，分别为工作意义（3个条目）、自主性（3个条目）、自我效能（3个条目）和工作影响（3个条目）。 PES具有较好的内容效度（CVI值＞0．8）。总量表Cronbach’s α系数为0．85，4个因子α系数范围为0．82～0．89。条目与因子描述的相关性均＞0．4，差异有统计学意义（P＜0．01）。结论中文版PES具有较好的效度和信度，尽管存在文化上的差异，仍适用于评估中国护理工作环境中人员心理对授权的认知状况。

Objective To adapt the Chinese version of Psychological Empowerment Scale （ PES ） among staff nurses and to evaluate the psychometric properties .Methods Based on the translation of PES , the evaluation of experts and investigation of 750 staff nurses was accomplished among 6 hospitals , aiming to finishing the linguistic adaptation , analysis of the validity and reliability .Statistical analysis included exploratory factor analysis, content validity, Cronbach ’ s αand item-to-total correlation.Results A total of 750 questionnaires, 710 questionnaires were effective , the effective recovery rate was 94.7%.In the factor analysis of PES, 4 factors were found to be reasonable , which were psychological empowerment-related meaning problems （3 items）, competence problems （3 items）, self-determination （3 items） and impact problems （3 items）, respectively.The Cronbach’sαcoefficient for the total score was 0.85 and varied between 0.82-0.89 for the 4 factors.The item-to-total correlation coefficients were higher than 0.40, the difference was statistically significant （P＆lt;0.01）.Conclusions The Chinese version of the Psychological Empowerment Scale seems to be reliable and valid .Although the cultural differences exist , PES still can be used to evaluate staff nurses ’ empowerment related psychological response in clinical situations .