期刊文献+

透光抚育对长白山“栽针保阔”红松林群落结构和凋落物影响 被引量:1

Effects of Liberation Felling on Structure and Litter of the Korean Pine Forests by Planting Conifer and Reserving Broad-leaved Trees in Changbai Mountains of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]为加快阔叶红松林恢复,完善“栽针保阔”恢复理论体系,并为阔叶红松林恢复实践提供科学依据。[方法]运用采伐试验方法,研究上层透光抚育(对照一栽针未采伐、轻度采伐-25%、中度采伐-50%、强度采伐-75%、皆伐-100%,采伐强度是指蓄积比例)对长白山中期(33年)“栽针保阔”红松林群落结构、群落蓄积量及凋落物的影响规律。[结果]①随着择伐强度增大,红松的重要值逐渐上升(0.364%~0.732%),红松在群落中的优势地位逐渐上升,而阔叶树种重要值却不断下降。②轻、中度择伐较对照凋落物量(6.11±0.42~7.45±0.79t/hm^2)显著提高了8.6%和13.7%(P〈0.05),强度择伐和皆伐降低1.2%和6.7%,但仅皆伐降低显著(P〈0.05);对于凋落物碳储量,中度择伐使其凋落物碳储量(2.13±0.39~2.82±0.37t/hm^2)较对照提高19.5%(P〈0.05),皆伐使其降低9.8%(P〈0.05)。⑧皆伐、强度择伐、中度择伐和轻度择伐蓄积量(221.2~260.6m^3/hm^2)较对照群落分别提高了26.9%、19.5%、15.9%和7.7%,且均与对照之间存在显著差异(P〈0.05)。而对于红松蓄积量(36.6~184.4m^3/hm^2),皆伐、强度择伐、中度择伐、轻度择伐依次较照样地提高了5.0、4.1、2.8、1.9倍,且均与对照有显著差异(P〈0.05)。[结论]从促进林分稳定性、维持凋落碳储量及提高森林的生态效益综合考虑,采伐强度应以中低度透光方式为宜。 [ Objective] In order to accelerate broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forests restoration, consummate the restoration of theoretical system about Korean pine forest by planting conifer and reserving broad-leaved tree, provide scientific basis for broad-leaved Korean pine for- ests restoration practice. [ Method] The effects of liberation cutting on community structure, litter biomass and stock volume from the mid-term (33-year-old) Korean pine forest restored by an approach of planting conifer and reserving broad-leaved tree was studied by using crown thinning control test method in Changbai Mountains of China. Five levels of cutting intensities were taken, which were no cutting-control, low- intensity selective cutting -25%, moderate-intensity selective cutting -50% and heavy-intensity selective cutting -75%, clear cutting - 100% (cutting intensity refer to the ratio of stock volume). [ Result] ①Important Value of Korean pine increased graduall(0. 364 -0. 732) along with the increasing of crown thinning and the predominant position of Korean Pine increased gradually, but Important Value of broad-leaf species decreased gradually. ②Compared to CK, low-intensity selective cutting and moderate-intensity selective cutting made the Litter bio- mass (6.11 ±0.42 -7.45 ± 0.79 t/hm2) increase by 8.6% and 13.7% (P 〈 0.05), while heavy-intensity selective cutting and clear cut- ting made it decrease by 1.2% and 6.7% respectively, and clear cutting had significant difference. For the litter carbon storage, Moderate- intensity selective cutting made the litter carbon storage (2.13 ±0.39 - 2.82±0.37 t/hm^2 ) increase by 19.5% than that of CK ( P 〈 0.05 ), while clear cutting reduced it by 9.8% (P 〈 0.05). ③Compared to CK, low-intensity selective cutting, moderate-intensity selective cutting, heavy-intensity selective cutting and clear cutting made Stock volume (221.2 - 260.6 m^3/hm^2 ) increase by 26.9% , 19.5% , 15.9% and 7.7% respectively( P 〈 0.05 ). For Korean pine volume ( 36.6 - 184.4 m^3/hm^2 ), low-intensity selective cutting, moderate-intensity selec- tive cutting, heavy-intensity selective cutting and clear cutting made Korean pine volume increase by 5.0, 4.1, 2.8, 1.9 times than that of CK respectively(P 〈0.05). [Conclusion] So low-intensity selective cutting and moderate-intensity selective cutting should be adopted to ac- celerate the stand stability, maintain litter carbon storage and promote forest ecological benefits for this kind of Korean pine forest.
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 2014年第3期818-822,共5页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家"十二五"农村领域科技计划课题(2012BAD21B0202-03)
关键词 透光抚育 “栽针保阔”红松林 群落结构 凋落物 蓄积量 Crown thinning Korean pine forests formed by planting conifer and protecting broad-leaved species Community structure Lit-ter Stand volume
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

二级参考文献222

共引文献929

同被引文献41

  • 1郝占庆,陶大立,赵士洞.长白山北坡阔叶红松林及其次生白桦林高等植物物种多样性比较[J].应用生态学报,1994,5(1):16-23. 被引量:120
  • 2杨金艳,王传宽.东北东部森林生态系统土壤碳贮量和碳通量[J].生态学报,2005,25(11):2875-2882. 被引量:204
  • 3李俊清,王业蘧.天然林内红松种群数量变化的波动性[J].生态学杂志,1986,5(5):1-5.
  • 4VALENTINI R, MATTEUCCI G, DOLMAN A J, et al. Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests [ J]. Nature, 2000, 404 : 861-865.
  • 5POST W M, EMANUEL W R, ZINKE P J, et al. Soil carbon pools and world life zones [J]. Nature,1982,298:156-159.
  • 6DIXON R K, BROWN S, HOUGHTON R A, et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems [ J]. Science, 1994, 263: 185-189.
  • 7KIRSCHBAUM M U F. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage [ J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1995, 27(6) : 753-760.
  • 8JURGENSEN M F, HARVEY A E, GRAHAM R T, et al. Impacts of timber harvesting on soil organic matter, nitrogen, productivity, and health of inland northwest forests [ J ]. Forest Science, 1997, 43 (2) : 234-251.
  • 9GRIGAL D F, VANCE E D. Influence of soil organic matter on forest productivity [ J ]. New Zealand Forest Research Institute, 2000, 30(1/2) : 169-205.
  • 10NAVE L E, VANCE E D, SWANSTON C W, et al. Harvest impacts on soil carbon storage in temperate forests [ J ]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259(5) : 857-866.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部