期刊文献+

非对称信息证券交易的跨期动态博弈均衡解析 被引量:1

Analysis on the Two-Period Dynamic Game Equilibrium of the Security Trade Subject to the Asymmetric Information
原文传递
导出
摘要 揭示了不对称信息条件下证券市场均衡的基本特征.Grossman和Stiglitz模型依据不知情交易者的弱理性,解析了证券交易的静态均衡状态.O'Hara模型增强了不知情交易者的理性,强调了市场均衡时的风险定价,但其命题的成立条件是相互矛盾的.认为不知情交易者信息收集和处理能力的提高会使决策更为理性,证券市场的均衡本质上是交易者的动态博弈均衡.依此思路,运用不完美信息的跨期动态博弈模型解析了非对称信息条件下证券交易者的精炼贝叶斯纳什均衡.结论显示出,市场失效的主要原因是交易者之间的信息分析能力不平衡,而不是信息不对称;市场流动性的决定因素不是信息不对称风险而是知情交易者与不知情交易者所研判的无风险收益率的差别. This paper examines the primary features of the security market equilibrium subject to asymmetric information.Grossman and Stiglitz 'model analyzes the static equilibrium of the security trade on the basis of the weak rationality of the uninformed trader.O'Hara's model is inclined to work on the risk pricing in the market equilibrium facing the more rational uniformed trader,but the conditions assuring that the propositions are tenable is incompatible.This paper argue that the higher capacity that the uninformed gather and analyze the information bring their more rational decisions,and the security market equilibrium is essentially dynamic game equilibrium.By the road,this paper analyzes deeply perfect Bayesian Nash equilibrium under the asymmetric information using the two-period dynamic game model with imperfect information.We conclude that the market ineffectiveness should be attributed to the imbalance of the information analysis capacity between the informed and the uninformed,not the asymmetric information,and the market fluidity level depends on the deference between the riskless earning ratio gained by the uninformed trader and the informed trader,not the imbalance of the information.
作者 王树强 叶莉
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期39-48,共10页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 国家社科基金(11BJL048) 天津市2012年度哲学社会科学规划课题(TJYY12-102) 天津市科技发展战略研究计划项目(12ZLZLZF06700) 河北省科学技术研究与发展计划项目(11457201D-61)的阶段性成果
关键词 精炼贝叶斯均衡 非对称信息 混同均衡 分离均衡 perfect bayesian equilibrium asymmetric information pooling equilibrium separating equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Grossman,Sanford J.and Stiglitz,Joseph.On the imposibility of informationally efficient markets[J].American Economic Review,1980(70):393-408.
  • 20'Hara,Maureen.Presidential Address:Liquidity and Price Discovery[J].Journal of Finance,2003,58(4):1335-1364.
  • 3De Long J,Shleifer A,Summers L,et al.Waldmann,Noise trader risk in financial markets[J].Journal of Po-litical Economy,1990,98(4):703-738.
  • 4Brennan,Michael,and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam.Market microstructure and asset pricing:On the compensation for illiquidity in stock returns[J].Journal of Financial Economics 1996,41:441-464.
  • 5Christie,William,and Roger Huang.Market structures and liquidity:A transactions data study of exchange listings[J].Journal of Financial Intermediation,1994,3:300-326.
  • 6Bessembinder,Henry.Issues in assessing trade execution costs[J].Journal of Financial Markets,2003,6:233-257.
  • 7敬志勇.时间偏好与无风险利率的决定[J].生产力研究,2007(24):66-67. 被引量:1

二级参考文献11

  • 1[1]Frederick,Loewenstein,O'Donoghue,2002,Time Discounting and Time Preference:A Critical Review,Journal of Economic Literature,11(6),351-401.
  • 2[2]B(o)ihm-Bawerk,Eugen Von.,1891,Capital and Interest:A Critical History of Eeonomical Theory,London:Macmillan and Co.
  • 3[3]Fisher,Irving,1930,TheTheory of Interest,New York,Macmillan.
  • 4[4]Paul Samuelson,1937,A Note on Measurement of Utility,Review of Economic Studies,4,155-161.
  • 5[5]Pigou,Arthur C.,1960,The Economics of Welfare,4th ed.,London:Macmillan.
  • 6[6]Loewenstein,George;Prelec,Drazen.,1991,Negative Time Preference,Ameriean Economic Review,8 1(2),347-352.
  • 7[7]Mancur Olson and Martin J.Bailey,1981,Positive Time Preference,Journal of Political Economy,89(1),1-25.
  • 8[8]Rowrs,Alan R.,1994,Evolution of Time Preference by Natural Selection,American Economic Review,84(3),460-481.
  • 9[9]Prelec,Drazen.2004,Decreasing Impatience:A Criterion for Non-stationary Time Preference and Hyperbolic Discounting,Scandinavian Journal of Economics,106(3),511-532.
  • 10[10]Gollier,Christian;Zeckhauser,Richard.,2005,Aggregation of Heterogeneous Time Preferences.Journal of Political Economy,113(4),878-896.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部