期刊文献+

不同远视力组飞行学员招飞选拔相关指标分析 被引量:7

An evaluation of some index to the different class of student pilots by distant vision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的综合评价不同远视力组飞行学员相关医学选拔指标现况,为进一步修订招收飞行学员视力标准提供依据。方法采取横断面调查方法,根据招收飞行学员体检号随机抽取某年度空军招收飞行学员共计290人,按照远视力0.8、0.9和≥1.0分为3组,整理招飞体检数据,进行飞行学员人口学基本特征问卷调查,增加心肺功能及声导抗等特殊检查,对比分析3组之间相关指标的差异。结果不同远视力组飞行学员心理选拔成绩方差分析显示,各组之间心理选拔基本分、总评分均存在统计学差异,0.8组心理选拔基本分成绩最低(5.18±1.49),1.0以上组心理选拔基本分成绩最高(6.03±1.26),0.9组心理选拔总评分最低(5.40±0.62),1.0以上组心理选拔总评分最高(5.89±0.62),高考成绩、心肺功能及听力等指标3个组别之间无统计学差异,且均符合相关医学正常参考值。结论建立远视力与心理选拔成绩相结合的联合选拔新标准将有可能从根本上解决视力标准放宽的核心问题。 Objective To evaluate the medical indexes of student pilots by different distant vision classes, and to discover the scientific evidence of revising vision standard to recruit student pilots. Methods A cross-section survey was conducted to the student pilots in some year, and 290 student pilots were classified into 3 groups by different distant vision (0.8, 0.9 and above 1.0), all sampled respondents were interviewed with questionnaire, physical examination, including distant vision, hearing, heart function, pulmonary function, database was established, cleaned and analyzed by EpiData 3.02, SAS 9.13 with double entered checking. Results Different class of student pilots by distant vision have different psychological selection performance record, the group 0.9 lowest (5.40? 0.62), the group above 1.0 highest(5.89?0.62), and the other indexes including entrance examination performance, distant vision, hearing, heart function and pulmonary function were provided, different class of student pilots by distant vision have no differences. Conclusions The vision standard to recruit student pilots should combine the psychological selection performance, and to determine the index of which should carry out prospective study.
出处 《武警医学》 CAS 2014年第2期136-138,共3页 Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force
基金 全军"十二五"后勤科研重大项目"飞行人员前瞻性医学选拔与生理功能飞行适应性评价研究"(AKJ11J003)资助
关键词 远视力 飞行学员 招飞选拔 distant vision student pilots pilot selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1United States Air Force.AFI 48-123,Medical examinations and standards[S].Washington:HQ USAF/SG,2011:23-25.
  • 2王生成,郑巨军.执行新招飞体检标准 提高飞行学员体检质量[J].航空军医,2006,34(1):30-32. 被引量:13
  • 3Paullin C,Katz L C,Kenneth T.et al.Review of aviator selection,ADA455302[R].Arlington:U.S.Army Research Institute for the Behavioral & Social Sciences,2006.
  • 4Jacobina S,Nancy T,Kenneth S,et al.Air force personnel research issues:a manager's handbook,ADA534240[R].Randolph:Air Force Personnel Center-Strategic Research and Analysis Branch,2007.
  • 5Fatolitis P,Jentsch F,Hancock P.Initial validation of novel performance-based measures:mental rotation and psychomotor ability,ADA529481[R].Pensacola:Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.2010.[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,2002,13(2):102.
  • 6张霞,马月欣,刘飒,等.全国第六次航空航天医学学术会议论文摘要[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,2002,13(2):102.
  • 7苗丹民,白延强,张其吉.Sternberg双重任务测验效度检验及文化因素影响分析[J].航天医学与医学工程,1998,11(6):439-443. 被引量:3

共引文献13

同被引文献84

引证文献7

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部