期刊文献+

基于生态足迹理论的凤阳县矿产资源规划生态承载力分析

Application of Ecological Footprint to the Mineral Resources Planning Environmental Impact Assessment——A case study ofmineral resources planning of ecological capacity of Fengyang County
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用可变世界单产法计算了2007~2011年凤阳县的生态足迹,得出人均生态盈余由2007年的1.412hm2下降到2011年的1.263hm2,说明了近年来凤阳县人口对自然资源的消费量逐年增加,生态足迹与生态承载力之间的矛盾加剧。根据凤阳县矿产资源总体规划实施内容,规划末期2015年人均生态足迹为0.960hm2/人,生态承载力为2.013hm2/人,生态盈余为1.053hm2/人,评价区域仍有一定的生态承载力,说明规划区在规划的指导下有序、合理的开发,生态承载力能满足凤阳县矿产资源规划方案的实施。 Ecological footprint is an important indicator to analyze the sustainable use of natural resources . This article calculates the ecological footprint of Fengyang County from 2007 to 2011 by adopting variable world yield method .The results show that the ecological surplus per capita has decreased from 1 .412 hm2 of2007 to 1 .263 hm2 of2011 ,w hich is highly possibly resulted from gradually increased natural resource de-velopment in the past few years .It shows the conflicts between ecological footprint and ecological capacity are going up .According to mineral resource development plan of Fengyang County ,in the year of 2015 , theecological footprint per capitawill reach0 .960 hm2 ,the ecological capacity per capitawill reach2 .013 hm2 and ecological surplus per capita willreach1 .053 hm2 .It indicates that the ecological capacity can fulfill the implementation of mineral resource development plan of Fengyang County if the development is under scien-tific and reasonable indication .
出处 《绿色科技》 2014年第3期108-110,共3页 Journal of Green Science and Technology
关键词 生态足迹 生态承载力 矿产资源 凤阳县 ecological footprint ecological capacity mineral resources Fengyang County
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1张志强,孙成权,程国栋,牛文元.可持续发展研究:进展与趋向[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(6):589-595. 被引量:192
  • 2徐中民,张志强,程国栋.可持续发展定量研究的几种新方法评介[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2000,10(2):60-64. 被引量:162
  • 3Zhongmin Xu,Ouodong Cheng, Dongjin Chen, et al. Economic di versity, development capacity and sustainable development of Chi nazi1. Ecological Economics, 2002,40 (3) : 369 - 378.
  • 4曹新向,梁留科,丁圣彦.可持续发展定量评价的生态足迹分析方法[J].自然杂志,2003,25(6):335-339. 被引量:38
  • 5Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Erb, K- H, et al. Ecological foot print time series of Australia,the Philippines,and South Korea for 1961- 1999: comparing the conventional approach to an ""actual land area"approach[J]. I.and Use Policy,2004,21(3) :261 -269.
  • 6Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P,et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J]. Ecol Econ, 1999,29:375-390.
  • 7Wackernagel M,Onisto L,Bello Petal. Ecological Footprint of Na- tions[R]. Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio+5 Fo- rum. International council for local Environmental Initiatives. To ronto :JCLEI, 1997.
  • 8Waekernagel M,David Y J. The ecological footprint: an indicator of process toward regional sustainability[J]. Environment Moni toring and Assessment, 1998 (5 ] ) .. 511 - 529.
  • 9Hardip, Barg S, Hodge T. Measuring sustainable development: Review of current practice [R]. Occasional paper number 17, 1997.
  • 10滁州市统计局.滁州统计年鉴(2008-2012)[R].滁州:滁州市统计局,2012.

二级参考文献69

共引文献361

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部