期刊文献+

黑格尔的艺术终结观研究 被引量:5

A Study on Hegel's the End of Art
原文传递
导出
摘要 近30年来,艺术终结命题引起知识界热烈讨论,作为最早提出此命题的黑格尔便进入了当代视野。客观而言,黑格尔的艺术终结观是其哲学体系的自然推衍,但从对这一命题的解读伊始,就存在争议。这种争议主要围绕着它的含义是否是指艺术的死亡来展开。克罗齐是目前主张从死亡的角度来解释黑格尔这一观点的代表,而黑格尔主义者鲍桑葵则持异议,从而成为倡导非死亡论的代表。鲍桑葵的意义在于,他转变了在黑格尔那里这一命题仅仅是其哲学体系的逻辑推衍的状态,将它变成了对艺术命运的预测。这恰与当下艺术终结命题的讨论遇合,为黑格尔的这一思想进入当下提供契机和依据。在当代视野中,学者们的争论与交锋,也丰富和拓宽了黑格尔的这一命题,加入了当代意义指向。 In his famous Aesthetics-Lectures on Fine Art, Hegel suggested that art would end. Philoso- phers after Hegel regarded his view as the origin of the thesis of "the end of art". This thesis has been widely discussed over the last 30 years in the academia, and Hegel's view is reexamined again. This pa- per consists of three parts. The first part talks about the end of art in Hegel's philosophy. In the second part which analyses the debates about Hegel's thesis of the end of art, the author proposes that the de- bates originated from Croce and Basanquet in early 20th century. Croce held that what Hegel claimed is the death of art. Whereas Basanquet thought Croce misunderstood Hegel, thus giving rise to a new perspective of looking into the thesis, that is, about the future of art. This new direction was in ac- cordance with the thesis under recent discussion. Hence Hegel's opinion entered into a new context and received new interpretation, which is the task of the third part of this paper.
作者 张冰
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期142-148,共7页 Journal of Renmin University of China
基金 国家社会科学基金西部项目"艺术终结的旅行--从西方到中国"(11XZW032)
关键词 黑格尔 艺术的终结 绝对精神 克罗齐 鲍桑葵 Hegel the thesis of "the end of art" absolute spirit Croce Basanquet
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Frederick Beiser. Hegel. London; Routledge, 2005.
  • 2亚历山大·科耶夫.《黑格尔导读》,姜志辉译,南京:译林出版社,2005年,第80页.
  • 3Hegel. Hegel's Philosophy of Mind. London: Oxford, 1894.
  • 4黑格尔:《美学》第一卷,载《朱光潜全集》,第十三卷,安徽教育出版社1990年版,第267页.
  • 5查尔斯·泰勒:《黑格尔》,张国清等译,南京:译林出版社,2009年,第579页.
  • 6John Steinfort Kendey. Hegel's Aesthetics. Chicago: S. C. Griggs and Company, 1885.
  • 7Bcat Wyss. Hegel's Art History and the Critique of Modernity. Cambridge= Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • 8克罗齐:《美学原理美学纲要》,朱光潜等译,北京:外国文学出版社,1983年,第15页、第165页、第170页、第12页、第230页、第233页、第233页、第164页、第7页、第16页、第126页.
  • 9Massimo Iiritano. "Death or Dissolution? Croce and Bosanquet on the 'Auflosung der Kunst ". Bradley Stud- ies, 2001, 7 (2).
  • 10鲍桑葵.《美学史》,张今译,桂林:广西师范大学出版社2001年版,第246-247页.

共引文献8

同被引文献53

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部