期刊文献+

论文士的浪漫及其在诗文中的表现——阮籍和屈原比较 被引量:1

Different Romance ——A Comparison between Ruan Ji and Qu Yuan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在阮籍和屈原的身上,都表现出同作为文士的浪漫品格,又有不同,源于两人独特的秉性与才情。屈原的自恋和阮籍的放达就是这种浪漫品格的具体表现。其次,两人的诗赋都表现了游仙之思,具有浓郁的浪漫主义色彩。屈原的仙界是个体情志的幻化,人神杂处;而阮籍的仙界则表现为一种永恒之在,仙心与玄思合而为一。最后,屈原的诗赋总体上表现为一种积极浪漫主义的风格,阮籍的咏怀诗则表现为一种消极浪漫主义的风格。这既是个性差异使然,也是不同时代背景下的必然结果。 Ruan Ji and Qu Yuan both had romantic character, which came from nature and talent. Qu yuan' s nar- cissism and Ruan Ji' s bohemianism were expressions of this romantic character. Their poems and Ode Poetry im- merged the thought of "Wander as Immortal" . Qu Yuan' s fairyland was a dreamland of his character and where human beings and gods live feeling, er. Ruan Ji' s was a immortal location, where thought about immortal and metaphysics became one. At last, Qu Yuan' s poems and Ode Poetry was positive romanticism and Ruan Ji' s was passive romanticism. These were because of their different characters and background of their ages.
作者 刘猛
出处 《天水师范学院学报》 2014年第1期39-42,共4页 Journal of Tianshui Normal University
关键词 自恋 放达 游仙诗 浪漫主义 narcissism no-constraints Poetry about Wander as Immortal romanticism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1朱熹.楚辞集注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979..
  • 2.史记·屈原贾生列传[M].,..
  • 3蒋骥.山带阁注楚辞[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1984:154.
  • 4晋书·阮籍传.
  • 5刘熙载.艺概[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978..
  • 6吉川幸次郎.中国诗史[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1986.
  • 7贺怡孙.骚筏[M].四库未收书辑刊第十辑第十三册.
  • 8谢逸.溪堂集[M].文渊阁四库全书本.

共引文献521

同被引文献155

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部