期刊文献+

社会情境中的干细胞伦理争议与处理——以“黄禹锡事件”为例 被引量:2

The Ethical Controversy of Stem Cell Research and Its Treatment in the Social Context: Analysis of Hwang Woo-Suk Case
下载PDF
导出
摘要 伦理问题一直是干细胞研究备受争议的关键问题,影响着各国政府和相关国际组织干细胞法律、政策、规范。但在具体的社会情境中,伦理问题受到多种利益的干扰。"黄禹锡事件"中社会态度的转变和事态的演变,特别好地阐释了这个问题。通过对事件过程和事件各方的分析可以发现,干细胞研究始终处于伦理观念尺度和事实价值选择尺度的共同作用和互相牵扯之下,无论是社会还是个人,当需要做出决定时,都会基于具体的社会情景和自身的实际需求,而做出某种具有倾向性的选择。 The ethical issue is always the key problem of stem cell research,which affects the law,policies and norm of stem cell research of the governments and relevant international organizations. But in the specific social context, ethical issue is affected by a variety of interests. The transformation of social attitude and the evolution of the situation of the Hwang Woo-Suk case can illustrate this problem very well. Through analyzing the processes of the case,we can find that stem cell research is always under the conflict of stem cell research between social ethic ideal, and the conflict of actual demand of achievements of stem cell research between social values. Whether society or individual, when needs to make a decision,it will make a tendentious choice based on the specific context and its own practical need.
作者 黄小茹
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期70-76,共7页 China Soft Science
关键词 干细胞 伦理 社会情境 黄禹锡事件 stem cells ethics social context the Hwang Woo-Suk case
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Apoorva Mandavilli, San Diego. Profile: woo-suk hwang [ J. Nature Medicine,2005,11 (5) :464-464.
  • 2David Cyranoski. Woo suk hwang convicted, but not of fraud [ J]. Nature,2009,461 : 1181.
  • 3Yvette Wohn. Seoul national university dismisses hwang [ J ]. Science,2006,311 : 1695.
  • 4宋尚勇,滕月.干细胞研究的伦理学——韩国黄禹锡丑闻的教训[J].中国医学伦理学,2007,20(2):11-13. 被引量:6
  • 5Sipp, Douglas. Stem cell research in asia: a critical view [ J ]. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 2009,107 ( 5 ) :853-856.
  • 6Soo Bin Park. South Korea steps up stem-cell work [ J ]. Nature,2012 News doi : 10. I038/nature. 2012. 10565.
  • 7Tsuge Azumi, Hong Hyunsoo, Reconsidering ethical issues about "voluntary egg donors" in Hwang's case in global context [ J ]. New Genetics and Society ,2011,30(3) :241-252.
  • 8Martina Franzen,Simone Rdder,Peter Weingart,顾鸿雁,李清,刘永胜,程萍.学术造假:科学界和媒体对其成因的阐释欠妥——行为失当主要是体制缺陷所致,并非仅为个人动机[J].科普研究,2009,4(1):58-62. 被引量:1
  • 9Kakuk Peter. The legacy of the hwang case:research mis- conduct in biosciences [ J ]. Science arm Engineering Ethics, 2009,15 (4) :545-562.

二级参考文献11

  • 1治疗性胚胎克隆研究的伦理特设委员会,韩国生命伦理学协会.宣言:医学和生物技术领域的研究必须遵循生命伦理学原则.2004-5-22.
  • 2Broad WJ,Wade N.Betrayers of the Truth:Fraudand Deceit in the Halls of Science[]..1982
  • 3Check E,Cyranoski D.Korean scandal will haveglobal fallout[].Nature.2005
  • 4.Correction or retraction?[].Nature.2006
  • 5Fuchs S,Westervelt SD.Fraud and trust in science[].Perspectives in Biology and Medicine.1996
  • 6Gabehart ME.An Analysis of Citations to RetractedArticles in the Scientific Literature[]..2005
  • 7Goodstein D.Conduct and Misconduct in Science[]..2002
  • 8.
  • 9Institute of Medicine,National Research Council Com-mittee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments.Integrity in Scientific Research:Creating anEnvironment that Promotes Responsible Conduct[]..2002
  • 10Kreutzberg GW.The rules of good science[].EMBO Reports.2004

共引文献5

同被引文献15

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部