期刊文献+

论证券储架发行制与授权资本制的契合——兼谈我国法定资本制的修正 被引量:3

On the Correspondence between the Securities Self Issue System and Authorized Capital System——Also on the Revision of China's Legal Capital System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分属不同法律部门且制度设计初衷相异的证券储架发行制与授权资本制竟存在诸种契合。"效率"是其共通的制度设计理念、"分次发行"是其共有的制度设计构造,并且在操作规程上两项制度存在着衔接与重合。然而,法定资本制却与证券储架发行制存在诸多冲突。为此,欲引入证券储架发行制必当对法定资本制进行修正,正式确立授权资本制或折衷授权资本制的公司法地位。 Though the securities shelf issue system and authorized capital system belong to different legal departments with different original intention of institutional design,they are corresponding with each other to some extent.'Efficiency' and 'Fractional Issue' are shared as the com-mon idea and structure of institutional design.And they also converge and overlap in operational rules.However,legal capital system is not attuned to the securities shelf issue system.So in order to introduce the securities shelf issue system,we should revise the legal capital system,and formally establish the legal status of authorized capital system or the compromised authorized capital system.
作者 刘志伟
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《上海金融》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期86-90,118,共5页 Shanghai Finance
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"新时期金融法变革中的消费者保护研究"(12-AFX012) 教育部新世纪优秀人才计划项目(NCET-11-1083)
关键词 储架发行 授权资本 法定资本 效率 分次发行 Shelf Issue Authorized Capital Legal Capital Efficiency Fractional Issue
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献73

  • 1See Maurice J. Dix, Adequate Risk Capital: The Consideration for the Benefit of Separate Incorporation ,Northwest University Law Review, Vol. 53, 1958-1959, pp. 478-494.
  • 2See Mark Van Hoecke and Mark Warrington, Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigm and Legal Doctrine : Towards a New Model for Comparative Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 47, 1998, pp. 495-536.
  • 3See Bayless Manning and James J. Hanks, Jr. , Legal Capital, Fourth Edition, Foundation Press, 2002, pp. 5-40.
  • 4See Corporate Capital and Restrictions upon Dividends under Modem Corporation Laws, California Law Review, Vol. 23, 1935, Pp229-263.
  • 5See Richard A. Booth, Capital Requirements in United States Corporation Law, 2005, University of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2005 - 64, Available at SSRN.
  • 6See Statutory Minimum Capitalization Requirements, Willamette Law Journal, Vol. 5, 1968-1969, pp. 331-343
  • 7See Robert Hamilton and Richard Booth, Corporation Finance: Cases and Materials, Third Edition, West Publishing Co. , 2001, pp. 67-91.
  • 8See Richard A. Booth, Capital Requirements in United States Corporation Law, Op. Cit.
  • 9Bayless Manning and James J. Hanks,Jr. , Legal Capital, Op. Cit. , p. 45.
  • 10See Robert Hamilton and Richard Booth, Corporation Finance: Cases and Materials, Op. Cit. , pp. 60-62.

同被引文献27

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部