期刊文献+

保险公司非量化与可量化风险显著性比较

The Comparison of Significance between Quantifiable and Non-quantifiable Risk in Insurance Company
下载PDF
导出
摘要 保险公司的风险可分为可量化风险与非量化风险两大类,需要采用不同的管控方法并配置相应的人力物力。因此,识别这两类风险哪一类更为显著对保险公司的监管及其自身的全面风险管理尤为重要。本文分别从风险的形成机制、文献分析和案例研究三个角度研究这个问题。初步结论是,我国保险业和保险公司目前的风险构成中,更为显著的是非量化风险。因此,无论是外部监管制度建设还是保险公司内部的全面风险管理体系建设,都应该更加注重制定和落实第二支柱下的各类风险管控措施。 The insurance company's risk can be divided into quantifiable risk and non-quantifiable risk,requiring different methods to control and configuring the appropriate human and material resources.Therefore,it is very important to identify which type is more significant for insurance company regulation and its own comprehensive risk management.This paper studies this problem from three angles including the formation mecha-nism of risk,the literature analysis and case studies.The preliminary conclusion is that the more eminent risk is the non-quantifiable risk in Chi-na's insurance industry and the current risk structure of insurance companies.Therefore,either in the external regulation or in the internal compre-hensive risk management of insurance company,we should pay more attention to developing and implementing risk control measures of various types of risks under the second pillar.
作者 汪丽萍 周晶
出处 《上海金融》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期102-107,119,共6页 Shanghai Finance
基金 国家自然科学青年基金项目"财产险公司保费增长与承保风险关系研究"(71103117) 上海财经大学2011年度博士研究生创新基金资助项目(CXJJ-2011-393)
关键词 保险公司 可量化风险 非量化风险 Insurance Company Quantifiable Risk Non-quantifiable Risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Hartman David,Robert Arvanitis,et al, 1990. Study of Insurance Company Insolvencies from 1969- 1987 to Measure the Effectiveness of Casualty Loss Reserve Opinions,American Academy of Actuaries Committee on Property Liability Insurance Financial Reporting.
  • 2Massey Roger,David Hart,James Widdows,et al,2003. Insurance Company Failure,GIRO Conven- tion General Insurance Study Group, London, England.
  • 3McDonnell William, 2002.Managing Risk: Practical lessons from recent "failures" of EU insurers.
  • 4Rosenberg Debbie,Shawna Ackerman,et al, 2010. Property/Casualty Insurance Company Insolven- cies. American Academy of Actuaries Property/Casual- ty Financial Soundness/Risk Management Committee.
  • 5Sharma Paul et al,2002. Prudential Supervi- sion of Insurance Undertakings ,The Conference of In- surance Supervisory Services of the Member States of the European Union.1.
  • 6U. S. House,Energy and Commerce Commit- tee, 1990. Failed Promise: Insurance Company Insol- vencies. A report by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
  • 7Oxera's report,2007. Insurance Guarantee Schemes in the EU: Comparative Analysis of Existing Schemes ,Analysis of Problems and Evaluation of Op- tions.
  • 8Kelliber,P. O. J.,D. Willmot et al 2013,A common risk classification system for the actuarial pro- fession, British Actuarial Journal, Volume 18, Part.
  • 9谢志刚,周晶.重新认识风险这个概念[J].保险研究,2013(2):101-108. 被引量:28
  • 10谢志刚.我国保险业和保险公司面临的外部和内部风险因素分析.中国保险业:风险、精算、监管.上海科技教育出版社,2009.

二级参考文献10

  • 1中国保监会.《保险公司风险管理指引(试行)》(保监发[2007]第23号)[Z].
  • 2中国保监会.《人身保险公司全面风险管理实施指引》(保监发[2010]第89号)[Z].
  • 3[美]富兰克H奈特(KnightF.H.).风险、不确定性和利润[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
  • 4American Institute of Chartered Property & Casualty Underwriter (AICPCU) :Foundations of Risk Manage- ment, Insurance, and Professionalism, CPCU 510,2004.
  • 5Arrow,K. J. (1965) ,Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing. Academic Book Store.
  • 6The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2009) : ISO/FDIS31000 Risk management-Princi- ple and guidelines.
  • 7The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2002) :ISO/IEC Guide 73 Risk Management-Vo- cabulary.
  • 8Pratt,J. W. (1964) ,Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometriea 32,122 -136.
  • 9Sarin, R. and Wakker, P. (1992). A simple axiomatisation of non-additive expected utility. Econometrica 60, 1255 - 1272.
  • 10中国保监会保险消费者权益保护局课题组.保险消费者权益问题的思考[J].保险研究,2012(9):86-91. 被引量:14

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部