期刊文献+

伙伴选择方式对创新网络绩效影响的仿真 被引量:1

Simulation studies on the impact of partner selection pattern on performance of innovation networks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分别基于社会资本和知识互补性2种不同的伙伴选择方式构建了创新网络的仿真模型,着重比较了2种伙伴选择方式对于创新网络绩效的影响.结果表明:当创新破坏程度较低时,吸收对于网络中的知识流动起主导调节作用,基于社会资本选择合作伙伴形成的创新网络,其创新绩效优于根据知识互补性选择伙伴形成的创新网络;而当创新的破坏程度较高时,网络中知识流动主要由创新驱动,根据知识互补性选择合作伙伴形成的创新网络其创新绩效更高. The paper constructs two different partner selection process models on the base of social capital and knowledge complementarities respectively. Then we build a simple simulation model of innovation networks, and focus on the relationship between the pattern of partner selection and performance of innovation networks.The results show that when innovation is incremental,the dominant source of movement in knowledge space is learning,and the innovation networks based on social capital consideration have more performances than that of the innovation net-works on the basis of knowledge complementarities.Whereas in a more disruptive innovation regime,it is innovation that dominates firms?movements in knowledge space,and the innovation networks on the basis of knowledge comple-mentarities perform better.
作者 来向红
出处 《南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2014年第1期17-25,共9页 Journal of Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金(71171116) 江苏省高校自然科学研究计划(10KJB170011)
关键词 创新网络 伙伴选择 社会资本 知识互补性 innovation networks partner selection social capitals knowledge complementarities
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Roijakkers N,Hagedoorn J.Inter-firm R&D partnering in pharmaceutical biotechnology since 1975 : Trends, patterns, and networks [ J ]. Research Policy, 2006, 35 (3) :431-446.
  • 2Cowan R ,Jonard N.Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge [ J ].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control ,2004,28(8) : 1557-1575.
  • 3Sorenson O, Rivkin J W,Fleming L.Complexity, networks and knowledge flow [ J ]. Research Policy, 2006,35 ( 7 ) : 994-1017.
  • 4Freeman C. Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues [ J ]. Research Policy, 1991, 20 ( 5 ) : 499-514.
  • 5Kogut B.The network as knowledge:Generative rules and the emergence of structure [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21 ( 3 ) : 405-425.
  • 6Powell W W,White D R, Koput K W, et al.Network dy- namics and field evolution:The growth of interorganiza- tional collaboration in the life sciences [ J ]. American Journal of Sociology, 2005,110 ( 4 ) : 1132-1205.
  • 7Baum J A C, Cowan R, Jonard N. Network-independent partner seleetion and the evolution of innovation networks [ J] .Management Science,2010,56( 11 ) :2094-2110.
  • 8Arino A, Torre J.Learning from failure:Towards an evolu- tionary model of collaborative ventures [ J ]. Organization Science. 1998.9(3) :306-325.
  • 9Ireland R D, Hin M A, Vaidyanath D. Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage [ J ]. Journal of Management,2002,28(3) :413-446.
  • 10Uzzi B.Social structure and competition in interfirm net- works : The paradox of embeddedness [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997,42( 1 ) : 35-67.

二级参考文献39

共引文献265

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部