摘要
阿多诺的否定辩证法以瓦解的思路开启了后现代主义的滥觞,其"内在批判"的否定策略和"星丛"理论与德里达釜底抽薪的"自毁原则"、"延异"理论殊途同归,然而,阿多诺浓厚的现代主义情怀使两者的否定观有本质区别,阿多诺否定之后依然"有"而德里达解构之后走向"无";对于未来理想的建构,阿多诺认为,艺术是现实的反题,"星丛"是理想化的乌托邦,而德里达的建构则是深度批判、无限开放、走向未来的弥赛亚式的希望。
Adorno＇s negative dialectics give rise to postmodernism with disintegrating thinking. Adorno＇s ＂immanent critique＂ negative strategy and ＂constellation＂ theory, and Derrida＇s drastic ＂self-destructive prin- ciple＂ and ＂differance＂ theory, each takes a different path towards the very same goal. However, Adorno＇s deep modernism feeling makes the negativism of both fundamentally different. Adorno still keep affirmation after negation while Derrida doesn＇t after deconstrnction. With regard to the construction of ideal life, Adorno regard art as reality＇s antithesis, ＂constellation＂ as Utopia. In contrast, Derrida＇s construction is deeply critical, infi- nite and messianic hope towards future.
出处
《阅江学刊》
2014年第1期105-110,共6页
Yuejiang Academic Journal
