期刊文献+

87份甘蓝型油菜恢复系与2份优良不育系的遗传差异

Genetic Diversity of Eighty-seven Restorer Lines and Two Excellent Male Sterile Lines in Brassica napus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用SSR和SRAP2种分子标记技术对87份甘蓝型油菜恢复系及2份不育系材料的遗传差异进行研究。2种标记混合聚类分析表明,在相似系数为0.65处将89份材料分成4大类,除恢复系83外,其余恢复系与2份不育系分布在不同类群中,说明这些恢复系与不育系亲缘关系较远,这与材料的遗传背景相一致。另外,在相似系数0.75处87份恢复系又被划分到14个不同亚类中,没有完全聚在一起,说明这些恢复系具有丰富的遗传多样性。遗传距离分析表明,编号为87的不育系与恢复系遗传距离变幅为0.325~0.492,平均遗传距离为0.414;编号为88的不育系与恢复系的遗传距离变幅为0.264~0.492,平均遗传距离为0.398。在以后的育种过程中,可以考虑从中选择分别与2个不育系的遗传距离在前20位的恢复系作为父本,以相应不育系作为母本配置杂交组合,选育优良杂交品种。 Genetic differences of 87 Brassica napus restorer lines and by using SSR and SRAP molecular markers. The cluster analysis indi grouped into 4 classes when the similarity coefficient was 0.65. The lines were distributed in different groups except No. 83 of restorer lin er lines and sterile lines had distant genetic relationship, which was c 2 male sterile lines were studied cated that all the materials were restorer lines and 2 male sterile e. It indicated that these restor- onsistent with the genetic back- ground of the materials. In addition, when the similarity coefficient was 0.75, the restorer lines were divided into 14 different sub-groups without in one group completely, it illustrated that these restorer lines had a rich genetic diversity. The genetic distance of all the materials was analyzed. The results showed that the genetic distance between and restorer lines ranged from 0. 325 to 0. 492, with the av- erage of 0. 414. The genetic distance between No. 88 of sterile line and restorer lines ranged from 0. 264 to 0. 492, with the average of 0. 398. In the subsequent breeding process, we can consider to choose the restorer lines whose genetic distance with 2 male sterile lines was in the top 20 as male par- ent, with the corresponding male sterile line as female parent to configure hybrid combination and breeding hybrid varieties.
出处 《西北农业学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期99-106,共8页 Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica
基金 国家油菜产业技术体系(CARS-13)
关键词 遗传距离 甘蓝型油菜 SSR SRAP Genetic distance Brassica napus L. SSR SRAP
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献66

  • 1李佳,沈斌章,韩继祥,甘莉.一种有效提取油菜叶片总DNA的方法[J].华中农业大学学报,1994,13(5):521-523. 被引量:103
  • 2程宁辉,杨金水,高燕萍,徐明良,钱旻,葛扣麟.玉米杂种一代与亲本基因表达差异的初步研究[J].科学通报,1996,41(5):451-454. 被引量:91
  • 3张向群.-[J].作物学报,1987,13(2):135-142.
  • 4The World Agricultural Outlook Board, United States Department of Agriculture. Area, yield, and production by main producers. Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade,2003, 6: 8.
  • 5Brandle J E, Mc Vetty P B E. Geographical diversity,parental selection and heterosis in oilseed rape. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1990,70: 935-940.
  • 6Zhang Q, Gao Y J, Saghai Maroof M A, Yang S H, Li J X.Molecular divergence and hybrid performance in rice.Molecular Breeding, 1995,1: 133-142.
  • 7Zhang Q, Zhou Z Q,Yang G P, Xu C G, Liu K D, Saghai Maroof M A. Molecular marker heterozygosity and hybrid performance in indica and japonica rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1996, 93: 1218-1224.
  • 8Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, McCouch S R, Tanksley S D. Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance and heterosis in rice as revealed by PCR-based markers.Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1996,92: 637-643.
  • 9Zhao MF, Li X H, Yang J B, Xu C G, Hu R Y, Liu D J, Zhang Q. Relationship between molecular marker heterozgosity and hybrid performance in intra-and inter-subspecific crosses of rice. Plant Breeding, 1999, 118: 139-144.
  • 10Stuber C W, Lincoln S E, Wolff D W, Helentjaris T, Lander E S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics, 1992, 132: 823-829.

共引文献146

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部