期刊文献+

混合IRT潜在模型及其应用轨迹 被引量:2

The Mixture Item Response Theory Models and Its Application Traces
下载PDF
导出
摘要 项目反应理论是测量被试潜在特质的现代测量理论,潜在类别分析是基于模型的潜在特质分类技术。混合项目反应理论将项目反应理论与潜在类别分析相结合,能够同时对被试分类并量化其潜在特质。在阐述混合项目反应理论概念、原理的基础上,介绍了MRM、mNRM和mPCM等几种常见混合模型及其参数估计方法,并从心理与行为特征分类、项目功能差异检测、测验效度评价等方面评述了其在心理测验中的应用发展轨迹。 Item response theory (IRT) is a modern measurement theory for accurately estimating individuals' ability, and latent class analysis (LCA) is a statistical technique used to identify subtypes of individuals, which is based on statistic models. Mixture item response theory (Mixture IRT)[0] combining LCA and IRT is able to classify the subjects as well as quantifying their traits. The concept and principle of Mixture IRT is elaborated in this paper. Besides, several common mixed models are introduced here, such as the mixed Rasch model (MRM), a mixture version of the nominal response model (mNRM) and a mixture version of the partial credit model (mPCM). Furthermore, different parameter estimation methods are described and the application traces in psychological test of Mixture IRT is evaluated from the perspectives of classifying psychological or behavioral traits, detecting differential item functioning and estimating test validity.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期540-548,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划教育部重点课题(GFA111009) 广州卓越教育项目:学生学业水平认知诊断评价 2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC190016) 广州市基础教育学业质量监测系统项目(GZIT2012-ZB0292)
关键词 项目反应理论(IRT) 潜在类别分析(LCA) 混合IRT 潜在结构 item response theory (IRT) latent class analysis (LCA) Mixture 1RT latent structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献47

  • 1Bonnefon, J. F., Eid, M., Vautier, S., & Jmel, S. (2008). A mixed Rasch model of dual-process conditional reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61,809-824.
  • 2Bonnefon, J. F., & Vautier, S. (2008). Defective truth tables and falsifying cards: Two measurement models yield no evidence of an underlying fleshing-out propensity. Thinking and Reasoning, 14, 231-243.
  • 3Bonnefon, J. F., Vautier, S., & Eid, M. (2007). Modelling individual differences in contrapositive reasoning with continuous latent state and trait variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1403-1413.
  • 4Eid, M. (1996). Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis for polytomous item responses: Model definition and model selection on the basis of stochastic measurement theory. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 1, 65-85. Retrieved August 24, 2008, from http://www.mpr-online.de.
  • 5Evans, J. S. B. T. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 978-996.
  • 6Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
  • 7Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., Neilens, H., & Over, D. E. (2007). Thinking about conditionals: A study of individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1772-1784.
  • 8Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., Neilens, H., & Over, D. E. (in press). Understanding causal conditionals: A study of individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
  • 9Klaczynski, P. A. (2001). Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision making. Child Development, 72, 844-861.
  • 10Newstead, S. E., Handley, S. J., Harley, C., Wright, H., & Farelly, D. (2004). Individual differences in deductive reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 33-60.

共引文献11

同被引文献24

  • 1曾秀芹,孟庆茂.项目功能差异及其检测方法[J].心理科学进展,1999,9(2):41-47. 被引量:27
  • 2骆方,张厚粲.检验项目功能差异的两类方法—CFA和IRT的比较[J].心理学探新,2006,26(1):74-78. 被引量:12
  • 3Rost, J. Rasch models in latent classes: An integra- tion of two approaches to item analysis [J]. Applied Psychologi- cal Measurement, 1990, 14 ( 3 ): 271-282.
  • 4Rost, J. A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses [J]. British Journal of Mathemati- cal and Statistical Psychology, 1991 ( 44 ): 75 -92.
  • 5Hye-Jeong Choi. A model that combines Diagnostic Classification Assessment with Mixture Item Response Theory Models [D] .The university of Georgia, 2010.33 -40.
  • 6吴毓莹,林原宏.潜在类别分析取向的除法概念结构[J].测验年刊,1996(43):345-358.
  • 7Preinerstorfer, D., Formann, A. K. Parameter recov- ery and model selection in mixed Rasch models [J]. British Jour- nal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2012, 65 (2): 251-262.
  • 8Sun-Joo Cho, Allan S. Cohen, Seock-Ho Kim. Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of a mixture item response theory model [J]. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simula- tion, 2013, 83(2 ):278-306.
  • 9ohn T. Willse. Mixture Rasch Models With Joint Max- imum Likelihood Estimation [J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011,71( 1 ):5-19.
  • 10Yunyun Dai. A Mixture Rasch Model With a Covari- ate: A Simulation Study via Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation [J]. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2013,37 (5):375-396.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部