期刊文献+

突变情景下团队学习的时间效应和阶段特征 被引量:7

The time effect and phase features of team learning under episodic change
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过实验模拟方法,以66个3人小组在决策任务中的交流中断为情景,对突变情景下团队状态目标取向和互动过程对适应性的多重影响作用进行了探讨。根据Lewin的变革三阶段模型,运用多层数据模型(HLM)和层次回归技术对数据进行了分析。结果表明:在突变情景下,学习和绩效取向对团队适应性有积极的作用,团队成员的变革承诺在学习取向与团队适应性的作用关系中有调节效应,高变革承诺水平强化了团队学习取向对适应性的影响。在不同的变革阶段,状态目标取向对团队适应性的影响不同,而互动过程对团队适应的作用也存在差异性,随着时间的延展,团队出现高水平适应的概率增加。 This paper discussed multi - effects on team adaptability of state goal orientation and interaction processes through ex- perimental simulation method given to 66 3 - person teams decision - making under change scenarios of communication interrup- tion. According to Lewin' s three - phase change model, the data were analyzed by use of HLM and step regression techniques. The results showed that learning and performance orientation have positive effects on team adaptability, Change commitment of team members have moderating effects between learning orientation and team adaptability and higher level of change commitment enhanced the influences of learning orientation on team adaptability. In different change phase, the effects of team state goal ori- entation and team interaction processes on team role structure adaptation were different. As the times of trail raising up the proba- bility of higher level of team role structure adaptation increased.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期75-81,共7页 Science Research Management
基金 教育部人文社科规划基金项目:转型升级背景下企业员工建言行为的模式 产生机制及其与变革效能的关系研究(12YJA630022 起止时间:2012-2014) 国家自然科学基金重点项目:基于人与组织动态匹配的组织变革策略与战略决策机制研究(70732001 起止时间:2008-2012 湖南省自然科学基金:企业合理化建议的产生机制--基于本土文化和氛围的视角(12JJ6069 起止时间:2012-2014)
关键词 团队目标取向 团队适应性 突变 变革阶段 互动过程 team goal orientation team adaptability episodic change change stage interaction processes
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献41

  • 1段锦云,王重鸣,钟建安.大五和组织公平感对进谏行为的影响研究[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):19-22. 被引量:84
  • 2Arvantis S., Loukis E. N.. Information and Communication Technologies, Human Capital, Workplace Organization and Labour Productivity: A Comparative Study Based on Firmlevel data for Greece and Switzerland. Information Economics and Policy, 2009, 21(1): 43-61.
  • 3Nikolaou I., Vakola M., Bourantas D.. Who Speaks up at Work? Dispositional Influences on Employee's Voice Behavior. Personnel Review, 2008, 37(6): 666-679.
  • 4VanDyne L., LePine J. A.. Helping and Voice Extra-role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41(1): 108-119.
  • 5Brockner J., Heuer L.. The Moderating Effect of Self-esteem in Reaction to Voice: Converging Evidence from Five Studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75(3): 394- 407.
  • 6Janssen O., Cozijinsen A. J.. Voicing by Adapting And Innovating Employees: An Empirical Study on how Personality and Environment Interact to Affect Voice Behavior. Human Relations, 1998, 51(7): 945-967.
  • 7Frese M., Teng E., Wijnen J. D.. Helping to Improve Suggestion Systems: Predictors of Making Suggestions in Companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1999, 20(6): 1139-1155.
  • 8LePine J. A., VanDyne L., Voice and Cooperative Behavior as Contrasting Forms of Contextual Performance: Evidence of Differential Relationships with Big Five Personality Characteristics and Cognitive Ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(4): 326-336.
  • 9Hirschman, A. O.. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. 1970, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 10Withey M. J., Cooper W. H.. Predicting Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1989, 34(4): 521-539.

共引文献26

同被引文献61

引证文献7

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部