期刊文献+

民法视野下的人体法益构造——以人体物性的科技利用为背景 被引量:16

Legal Interests of Human Body from the Civil Law Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 近现代民法体系所持的"人体为主体人格之一部"的立场系建立在传统人物两分理论基础之上,该理论虽有助于彰显人的主体价值和尊严,但在处理因人的活体、尸体、离体组织和基因的科技利用所生法律问题上,已显现出部分失灵和易加剧人体物性利用与人性尊严保障之间价值冲突的不足。人与物或人格与财产的区分并非绝对不容许因应时代变迁而作必要修正。通过逻辑的、价值的、实践的和法释义学的综合考量,理论上可以得出,有限地承认人体为物,并将"人体财产权"和人类作为物种享有的"类的人性尊严"纳入到人体法益构造体系之中,能较好地克服以上不足。在以公序良俗原则限制人体或其一部的利用和处分时,应建立和实践"人性尊严关联度原则"。 The modem civil law doctrine that "the human body is part of natural person' s personality" is based on the traditional theory of distinguishing between human beings and things, established by Kant and other classical philosophers. This doctrine, as a consensus reached in a specific historical context, serves to highlight the value and dignity of human beings. However, it has shown some deficiencies when dealing with legal problems resulting from scientific use of human bodies, remains, tissues and genes and, in some cases, even aggravated the value conflict between the utilization of human body and the protection of human dignity. The traditional doctrine of distinguishing between hu- man beings and things or between personality and property is not absolute, but allows for necessary modification along with the passage of time. A comprehensive consideration of the issue from logical, value, practical and legal dogmatic perspectives leads to the following conclusion : recognizing that the human body is to a certain extent also a property and incorporating "the property right of human body" and "dignity of human being as a species" into the system of legal interests of human body will not only enable us to overcome the above-mentioned deficiencies, but also provide us with a new legal perspective to the problems caused by the scientific use of human body. When using "public order and moral" as ground for limiting the use and disposition of the human body or part of it, "the rule of relevancy to humanity dignity" should be established and practiced so as to balance the welfare value and ethical value relating to the use of human body.
作者 汪志刚
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期93-115,共23页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 人体 人格 人体财产权 人性尊严 human body, things, personality, right to human body as property, humanity dignity
  • 相关文献

参考文献61

  • 1苏永钦.《民事财产法在新世纪面临的挑战》[A]..《走进新世纪的私法自治》[C].中国政法大学出版社,2002年版.第55页.
  • 2[德]梅迪库斯 邵建东译.《德国民法总论》[M].法律出版社,2000年版.第167-169页.
  • 3王泽鉴.《民法总则》,中国政法大学出版社2003年版,第71页.
  • 4王利明.《民法学》,法律出版社2008年版,第835页.
  • 5[日]富井政章.《民法原论》第l卷,陈海瀛、陈海超译,中国政法大学出版社2003年版,第190页.
  • 6Johannes Brunner, Theorie und Praxis im Leichenrecht, NJW 1173 (1953).
  • 7[德]施瓦布:《民法导论》,郑冲译,法律出版社2006年版,第196页,第216页,第218页,第214页
  • 8崔建远等编著.《物权法》,清华大学出版社,2008年版,第250页.
  • 9税兵.身后损害的法律拟制——穿越生死线的民法机理[J].中国社会科学,2011(6):95-108. 被引量:25
  • 10李悌恺.《论尸体之法律性质》,《台湾本土法学杂志》第56期(2004年3月).

二级参考文献304

共引文献1021

同被引文献257

引证文献16

二级引证文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部