摘要
北宋石篆山《严逊记》碑提供了很多历史信息,细致分析《严逊记》,可知宋佛会寺并不存在。严逊在分家以后对整个家族的资产并没有支配权,其养老粮除去生活之用和造像费用,并没有多余的钱用来供养寺院和僧人。严逊的儿子们并不支持造像举动,石篆山土地不会捐给寺院,而是3个儿子均分。希昼只是严逊的亲戚或者是他比较推崇的僧人,是从外地请来参加石像落成典礼的,并不是"佛会寺"开山住持。明代的佛惠寺重修者,有意捏造了宋"佛会寺"的存在是为了寺院经营上的考虑。
The Inscription ofYan Xun in Shizhuan Mountain provides a lot of historical information.Based on the detailed analysis of the context,it is clear that there was no Fohui temple in Song dynasty.Yan Xun could not con-trol the whole family’s assets after separation,so his endowment could only be used for his life and building stat-ues,So no money left to support the temples and monks.Yan Xun's sons didn't support him and they would divide equally the mountain land rather than give it to the temple.Monk Xi Zhou was just Yan Xun's relative or a monk he admired.He was invited to attend the inauguration ceremony of the stone statute but not the first abbot of Fohui Temple.In the Ming dynasty,the temple was rebuilt and a story on“Fohui Temple”was intentionally fabricated by monks for economic benefits.
出处
《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2014年第1期60-67,共8页
Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
《严逊记》
历史信息
佛会寺
The Inscription ofYan Xun
historical information
Fohui Temple