期刊文献+

英语写作中间接性言语特征分析

An Analysis of Obliqueness in English Writing in Views of Cognitive Process and Theme/Rheme
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在英语写作中,当要求用某一领域的知识来作答时,学生往往会复制内容信息,而不是重新建构知识来回答,这就是间接性言语行为。写作认知分析表明,问题与回答的不一致是由于思维活动中任务说明和修辞目标设定的局限性;而学生把问题看成是资料叙述,所以写作是受基于内容和语句的目标所驱动。从写作认知理论和Haliday功能语法主/述位概念两个角度分析学生间接言语行为,有助于了解学生的写作认知过程,同时对英语课堂写作教学有实践指导意义。 In writing, when required to use knowledge in a given context to fulfill a task, many student writers tend to copy the original content instead of restructuring it to answer the focal demand of the question. This is an oblique answer. This paper analyses obliqueness as a writing problem in views of cognitive process theory and Halliday's functional grammar, using from the concepts of Theme / Rheme. A cognitive study of oblique answers in writing suggests that the lack of fitness between answer and question arises from limitations in the mental processes of task interpretation and rhetorical goal setting. The student writer interprets the task as an information recount task, and therefore the writing is driven by goals that are essentially content- and sentence-based. A theme/Rheme analysis of obliqueness reveals that inappropriate choice of information for Theme contributes towards the difference between an oblique answer and question. Analyzing obliqueness in students' writing from in views of cognitive process and Theme/Rheme un-covers insights into students'composing processes that have implications for the practical writing classroom.
作者 李丽
出处 《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第1期76-78,共3页 Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 英语写作 间接言语 认知过程 主述位概念 English writing obliqueness the cognitive process theory the concepts of theme/rheme
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Halliday, M.A.K. A n Introduction to Functional Grammar[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.
  • 2Halliday, M.A.K. A n Introduction to Functional Grammar. Second Edition. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.
  • 3Flower, L. & Hayes,J.R. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition & Communication, 1981(32): 365-387.
  • 4Hayes, J.R. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C.M. Levy and S. Ransdell (Eds.), 1996.
  • 5The Science of Writing, Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.
  • 6Chenoweth, A. Recognizing the role of reading in writing. Paper presented at College Composition & Communication Conference. Washington, DC, 1995.
  • 7Freedman, A. The what, where, when, why, and how of classroom genres. In J. Petraglia (Ed.) 1995. Reconceiving Writing. Rethinking Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • 8Flower, L. & Hayes, J.R. The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L.W. Gregg and E.R. Steinberg (Eds.). Cognitive Processes in Writing. Hilladale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1980.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部