期刊文献+

排污权交易定价下的COD和氨氮削减成本分析研究 被引量:10

Analysis on Elimination Costs of COD and Ammonium for Emission Trade Price Determination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 调查测算了工业废水COD和氨氮削减成本并进行了分析。总成本中折旧费和日常运行费各占35%和65%;COD和氨氮削减成本为1 287元/t^29 035元/t和2 433元/t^46 560元/t,加权均值为4 936元/t和17 755元/t,二者之比为3.60∶1,90%置信区间为(4 647,8 514)和(13 989,24 617);70%和63.2%的企业以6 837元/t和20 083元/t以内的成本削减了73.7%的COD和42.1%的氨氮。不同企业和行业COD和氨氮削减成本差异明显,以概率分布确定综合成本用于排污权交易定价可能更合理。 In this paper, survey campaign of industrial wastewater treatment was carried out , based on which elimination costs of COD and ammonium were obtained.The results showed that the total cost is composed of 35%depreciation of capital as-sert and 65% daily running cost.The elimination costs of industrial COD and ammonium are 1 287 to 29 035 yuan/t and 2 433 to 46 560 yuan/t with weighted averages of 4 936 and 17 755 yuan/t, and ratio of 3.60:1.Confidence intervals of the elimina-tion costs of COD and ammonium under 90%confidence level are(4 6478, 514 ) and(13 989,24 617).70%and 63.2%of the investigated enterprises treated 73.7% COD and 42.1% ammonium with the costs below 6 837 yuan/t and 20 083 yuan/t.It might be reasonable to determine the emission trade price based on the social average elimination costs derived by probability method and costs survey due to the obvious difference among enterprises and industries.
出处 《环境科学与管理》 CAS 2014年第3期50-53,共4页 Environmental Science and Management
基金 重庆市环保局环保科技项目(环科字2012第(07)号)
关键词 工业废水 COD 氨氮 削减成本 排污权交易 industrial wastewater COD ammonium elimination cost emission trade
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献15

  • 1刘雪梅,何逢标.基于成本性态与CVP法的污水处理企业经济分析[J].中国给水排水,2006,22(14):83-85. 被引量:4
  • 2Henze M,Harremoes P.污水生物处理与化学处理技术.国家城市给水排水工程技术研究中心(译).北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1999
  • 3Schulz A, Obenaus F, Egerland B, et al. Elimination costs for different wastewater compounds [J]. Water Sci. Technol., 2003, 47(12):119-124.
  • 4Onnerth T B, Nielsen M K, Stamer C. Advanced computer control based on real and software sensors [J]. Water Sci. Technol., 1996, 33(1):237-245.
  • 5Samuelsson E Halvarsson B, Carlsson B. Cost-efficient operation of a denitrifying activated sludge process [J]. Water Research, 2006,41 (11):2325-2332.
  • 6Yamanaka O, Obara T, Yamamoto K. Total cost minimization control scheme for biological wastewater treatment process and its evaluation based on the COST benchmark process [J]. Water Sci. Technol., 2006,53(4/5):203-214.
  • 7Committee to Assess the Scientific Basis of the Total Maximum Daily Load Approach to Water Pollution Reduction. Assessing the TMDL approach to water quality management [M]. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 2001 : 12-21.
  • 8OWEN W F.污水能效与能耗[M].章北平,车武译.北京:能源出版社.1989:25-37.
  • 9仇保兴.落实节能减排任务 推进城乡污水处理与安全供水[J].住宅产业,2007(8):10-12. 被引量:1
  • 10国家环境保护总局──关于发布《污水综合排放标准》(GB8978-1996)中石化工业COD标准值修改单的通知[J]中国环保产业,2000(01).

共引文献91

同被引文献76

引证文献10

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部