期刊文献+

TPP劳动标准议题的后续谈判与中国的选择 被引量:5

Linkage Model of Labor Standard in Further TPP Negotiation and China's Choice
原文传递
导出
摘要 劳动标准问题历经18轮谈判远未达成一致的事实反映出,在劳动标准纳入自由贸易协定方面,美国预设的一体化模式在逡巡不前的谈判面前已显出困境。TPP谈判自第18轮开始接受日本正式加入的新情况虽可能加强美国关于劳动标准问题建议文本的影响,却难以改变此前谈判业已形成的美国、加拿大和新西兰既有实践相互竞争的基本格局。要推动TPP劳动标准议题的后续谈判尽快完成,谈判方可能需要采取议题区分的思路,转向并列模式。当前美国保守的共和党执掌国会以及多数谈判方反对美国政府建议的"缔约方实施国内劳动法方面的完全强制执行机制",使得纳入模式的转变成为可能。诚然,TPP谈判中的劳动标准问题对中国加入谈判带来一定的挑战,但中国有必要以更具建设性的眼光看待劳动标准方面的国际合作。劳动标准问题不应成为中国考虑加入TPP谈判的阻碍因素。 The fact that the participants of TPP negotiation still cannot reach a consensus on the issue of labor standard after the 18th Round well demonstrates that the integrated mode of linking labor standard with FTTA proposed by US has gone into difficulties as the participants hesitate to move ahead. The entry of Japan into TPP negotiation since the 18th Round might strengthen US proposal on labor standard, but could hardly change the negotiation structure on the issue of labor standard. To reach some agreement as soon as possible, the participants might need to differentiate the issue of labor standard from others and shift the integrated mode into a parallel mode. There is a possibility for this shift due to the fact that the Conservative Republic Party currently dominates the Congress and most participants object to US proposal of fully enforceable mechanism for the implementation of domestic labor standard. Although the issue of labor standard might be a challenge for China to join TPP negotiation, it is currently necessary for China to consider international cooperation on labor standard more constructively. The issue of labor standard should not be a stumbling stone for China's decision on whether to join TPP negotiation or not.
作者 郑丽珍
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期107-118,共12页 International Economics and Trade Research
关键词 TPP谈判 劳动标准 自由贸易协定 中国 TPP negotiation labor standard free trade agreement China
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Malaysia Says 14 TPP Chapters 'Substantially Closed', Lists Procurement Objections, Inside U.S. Trade, daily news, June 24, 2013,at http://insidetrade.com,last visited June 24, 2013.
  • 2http://www.ustr.gov/tpp,last visited Dec.25,2013.
  • 3TPP Ministers Drop Year-End Goal, But Linkages Come Into Focus,Inside U.S. Trade, daily news, Dec.12,2013,at http://insidetrade.com,last visited Dec.13, 2013.
  • 4U.S.-Japan Market Access Talks In TPP Not To Begin Until Late August, Inside U.S. Trade, daily news, June 20, 2013,at http://msidetrade.com(last visited June 20, 2013.
  • 5Statement on the 18th Round of Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations in Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia,at http://www.ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/trans- pacific-partnership/round-18-malaysia,last visited AugustlS, 2013.
  • 6联合国贸易与发展大会网站,http://www.unctadxi.org/templates/DocSearch.aspx?id=779,1ast visited Sep.15, 20130.
  • 7WTO,World Trade Report 2013,p27.
  • 8http://www.state.gov/e/eb/tpp/bta/fta/fta/index.htm,lastvisited Sep.30,2013.
  • 9http://www.mfat.govt.nz,last visited Sep.30,2013.
  • 10USTR Tables TPP Labor Proposal that Goes Beyond May 10 Temple, Inside U.S. Trade, daily news, January 6, 2012, at http://insidetrade.com, last visited Sep.30,2013.

二级参考文献53

  • 1陈小瑾,陈磊.中国将为《劳动合同法》付出代价[J].南方人物周刊,2007,0(29):23-24. 被引量:6
  • 2托马斯·寇肯、哈瑞·卡兹、罗伯特·麦克西.《美国产业关系的转型》,朱飞、王侃译,北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2008年,第9页.
  • 3常凯.《关于罢工合法性的法律分析-以南海本田罢工为案例的研究》[J].战略与管理,2010,(7).
  • 4《劳动合同法实施后合同签订率由不足20%提升至93%》,http://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2009-03/09/content_10977393.htm,2011年6月20日访问.
  • 5陈佩华.革命乎?组合主义乎?-后毛泽东时期的工会和工人运动.当代中国研究,1994,.
  • 6常凯.《工潮问题的调查与分析》[A]..《当代工会文丛》第一辑[C].工人出版社,1988年版.第56页.
  • 7《马克思恩格斯全集》,第48卷,第12页,北京,人民出版社,1985年版
  • 8《马克思恩格斯选集》第2卷,北京:人民出版社,1972年,第134至135页.
  • 9卢卡奇.《历史与阶级意识》,北京:商务印书馆,1999年,第231页.
  • 10日本労働法学会編:<現代労働法講座(1)労働法の基礎理論>,東京:日本労働法学会,1981年, 第83頁.

共引文献315

同被引文献43

  • 1谭浩邦.积极应对蓝色贸易壁垒——SA8000[J].国际经贸探索,2004,20(6):70-73. 被引量:22
  • 2任平.积极应对SA8000及蓝色贸易壁垒[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2006(7):32-33. 被引量:5
  • 3乌·贝克 哈贝马斯 王学东译.全球化与政治[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2000..
  • 4赵春明.2014,国际经济规则新趋势及我国应对策略?[N].光明日报.
  • 5Bertram Boie.2012.1abor related provisions in international investment agreement[R]. Employment working paper, NO. 126.
  • 6European Commission.2013. Impact Assessment Report on The EU-China Investment Relations[R].SWD (2013) 185 final.
  • 7Julia Hueckel.2012.Rebalancing Legitimacy and Sovereignty in International Investment Agreements [J].Emory Law Joumal,Vol.61.
  • 8Kimberly Ann Elliott, 2000. The ILO and Enforcement of Core Labor Standards [J].International Economic Policy Briefs, Number 00--6.
  • 9Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder,Lise Johnson. 2010. Belgium's Model Bilateral Investment Treaty: A review[EB/OL]. http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2011/belgiums model_bit.pdf.last visited December 20, 2014.
  • 10OECD. 2006. Novel Features in Recent OECD Bilateral Investment Treaties [R]. OECD International Investment Perspectives.

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部