期刊文献+

现金股利政策影响了QFII的投资偏好么? 被引量:4

Does Cash Dividend Policy Affect the Investment Preferences of QFIIs?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究OFII的投资行为对于我国在有限开放资本市场过程中发挥QFII制度的积极作用意义深远c以2004—2012年中国A股上市公司为研究样本,采用logit和tobit模型,本文从静态和动态两个维度检验了现金股利政策对OFII投资偏好的影响,发现:(1)从静态的角度来看,以持股倾向和持股比例度量的QFII投资偏好,与上市公司上一年度实施过现金股利分配以及现金股利支付水平显著正相关;(2)从动态的角度来看,QFII的持股偏好与上市公司近几年连续实施过现金股利分配及近几年现金股利平均支付水平呈显著正相关关系。本文的研究结论表明,在中国资本市场上,现金股利政策向QFII传递了上市公司的有关信息,最终影响了QFII的投资决策. The research on the investment behavior of QFIIs is significantly meaningful for the QFII system to play an active role during China's limited liberalization of capital market.Taking China's A-share listed companies during the period from 2004 to 2012 for example and by using logit and tobit models,this paper examines the influence of cash dividend policies on the investment preferences of QFIIs from static and dynamic dimensions.The evidence indicates that QFIIs show preferences for firms to pay(more) cash dividends in die previous year or pay cash dividends continuously during the last few years.Moreover,the shareholding ratios of QFIIs have significantly positive relationship with the level of cash dividends of firms.The results suggest that cash dividend policies convey some information about listed firms to QFIIs in China's capital market,and finally affect the decision making of QFIIs.
作者 徐寿福
出处 《上海金融》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期71-77,118,共7页 Shanghai Finance
基金 2012年上海高校青年教师培养资助计划项目”政策干预、现金股利政策与公司价值” 2014年上海市教委科研创新项目“现金股利的治理功能及其效应研究”(14YS100) 上海市一流学科应用经济学建设项目
关键词 现金股利政策 QFⅡ 投资偏好 信号传递 代理冲突 Cash Dividend Policy QFII Investment Preference Signaling Agency Conflict
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Easterbrook, F. H. Two Agency-Cost Explana- tions of Dividends [J]. American Economic Review, 1984, 74: 650-659.
  • 2Faccio, M., Lang, L. H. P. and Young, L. Divi- dends and Expropriation [J]. American Economic Re- view, 2001, 91: 54-78.
  • 3Grinstein, Y. and Michaely, R. Institutional Holdings and Payout Policy [J]. Journal of Finance, 2005, 60: 1389-1426.
  • 4Jensen, M. C. Agency Cost of' Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers [J]. American Eco- nomic Review, 1986, 76: 323-329.
  • 5Jeon J., Lee, C. and Moffett, C. Effects of For- eign Ownership on Payout Policy: Evidence from the Korean Market [J]. Journal of Financial Markets, 2011, 14: 344-375.
  • 6La Portal, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World [J]. Journal of Finance, 2000, 55: 1- 33.
  • 7Rozeff, M. S. Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 1982, 5: 249-259.
  • 8Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94: 461-488.
  • 9白重恩,刘俏,陆洲,宋敏,张俊喜.中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究[J].经济研究,2005,40(2):81-91. 被引量:1329
  • 10董艳,李凤.管理层持股、股利政策与代理问题[J].经济学(季刊),2011,10(2):1015-1038. 被引量:78

二级参考文献266

共引文献3149

同被引文献50

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部