期刊文献+

胰岛素注射量化教育与随机教育对糖尿病治疗效果的对比研究 被引量:10

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIABETES TREATMENT EFFECT BETWEEN INSULIN INJECTION QUANTITATIVE EDUCATION AND RANDOM EDUCATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胰岛素注射知识量化教育与随机教育对糖尿病治疗效果的影响。方法选择糖尿病患者136例,按随机数字表法将其分为量化教育组和随机教育组,每组68例。分别按胰岛素注射知识量化教育与随机教育2种模式,对患者实施健康教育。于出院前1d通过知识问卷调查患者对胰岛素注射知识的掌握程度,于出院后每周复诊测定空腹及餐后2h血糖,连续观察12周,并于出院3个月门诊检测糖化血红蛋白。结果与随机教育组比,胰岛素注射量化教育组宣教内容掌握率、患者对教育满意度及血糖、糖化血红蛋白达标率明显增高(P<0.05)。结论胰岛素注射知识量化教育对糖尿病治疗效果明显优于胰岛素注射知识随机教育。 Objective To investigate the diabetes treatment effect between insulin injection quantitative education and random education. Methods A study of 136 cases with diabetes, who were randomly divided into quantitative education group (n = 68 ) and random education group (n = 68 ). Health education was performed in two groups, one for insulin injection quantitative education, the another for random education. The mastery degree about the knowledge of insulin injection on patients was seen according to knowledge questionnaire. In addition, the fasting" glucose and postprandial glucose of 2 hours were tested after the patients were discharged continuously in 12 weeks. The last, glycosylated hemoglobin was tested in the clinic after the patients were discharged for three months. Results Compared with the random education group, the master rate of propaganda and education, the satisfaction of education and the target rate of blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin of the patients in insulin injection quantitative education group were significantly increased ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The treatment effect of insulin injection quantitative education is obviously superior to random education in diabetic diabetes.
出处 《河北医科大学学报》 CAS 2014年第1期16-18,共3页 Journal of Hebei Medical University
关键词 糖尿病 胰岛素 健康教育 diabetes mellitus insulin heuhh education
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献46

共引文献121

同被引文献87

  • 1孙子林,鞠昌萍,叶秀利.2011中国糖尿病患者胰岛素使用教育管理规范解读[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(3):54-57. 被引量:35
  • 2沈稚舟,张朝云.关于胰岛素强化治疗的几点认识[J].中华糖尿病杂志(1006-6187),2005,13(5):392-392. 被引量:11
  • 3中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国糖尿病患者胰岛素使用教育管理规范[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,2011:95-96.
  • 4HAYES AJ, LEAL J, GRAY AM, et al. UKPDS Outcomes Model2:a new version of a model to simulate lifetime health outcomes of patients.with type 2 diabetes mellitus using data from the 30 year United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study: UKPDS 82 [J].Diabetologia, 2013,56 (9) : 1925 - 1933.
  • 5PAGANO E, GRAY As ROSATO R, et al. Prediction of mortality and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model in the Casale Monferrato Survey, Italy[J]. Diabetologia, 2013, 56 ( 8 ) : 1726-1734.
  • 6XU Y, WANG L, HE J, et al.Prevalence and control diabetes in Chinese adults[J].JAMA, 2013,310 (9) : 948- 959.
  • 7刘庭芳,刘勇.中国医院品管圈手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:1-30.
  • 8MORIKAWA H.American Association of Diabetes Educators, the current DSME( diabetes selbmanagement education) standards[J].Nihon Rinsho Nihon Rinsho,2012,70( Suppl 5) : 617-623.
  • 9SANCHEZ A, SILVESTRE C, SAUTO R, et al.Feasibility and effectiveness of the implementation of a primary prevention programme for type 2 diabetes in routine primary care practice:a phase IV cluster randomised clinical trial[J]. BMC Family Practice, 2012,13 : 109.
  • 10王洪波,张利娟.如何指导糖尿病患者注射胰岛素的健康教育[J].健康之路,2014,(2):217-217.

引证文献10

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部