期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床对比分析 被引量:54

Comparative analysis between laparoscopy and laparotomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效。方法:选取2012年2月至2013年2月150例急性阑尾炎患者作为研究对象。其中60例行腹腔镜手术(腹腔镜组),90例行开腹手术(开腹组),对比两组患者手术时间、出血量、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、下床活动时间、切口大小、感染情况、治疗总费用及手术前后患者白细胞、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞水平的变化。结果:与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组手术时间、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、恢复下床活动时间均明显缩短,且出血量较少,切口小,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后第1天,开腹组白细胞、中性粒细胞水平升高,且明显高于腹腔镜组;术后第3天,各项指标逐渐降低并趋于正常水平,但开腹组白细胞水平仍高于腹腔镜组(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎具有切口小、患者恢复时间短、痛苦少、住院时间短、全身反应较小等优势,但其治疗费用相对较高。 Objective:To comparatively analyze the clinical effect of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the treatment of acute ap- pendicitis. Methods:There were 150 patients of acute appendicitis who were chosen as the research objects and underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy from Feb. 2012 to Feb. 2013. Sixty patients were treated with laparoscopic surgery (the laparoscopy group) and ninety pa- tients were treated with open appendectomy ( the laparotomy group). The differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, blood loss ,the recovery time of postoperative gastrointestinal function ,time of ambulation after surgery, incision size, infection, the total treatment cost, the preoperative and postoperative level of patients' WBC, neutrophil granulocyte and lymphocyte were comparatively an- alyzed. Results: Comparing with the laparotomy group, the laparoseopy group was obviously shorter in the operation time, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function and the time to ambulation after surgery. Furthermore, volume of blood loss decreased significantly and the incision size was also smaller in laparoseopic group. The differences were statistically significant ( P 〈 O. 05 ). On the first day after operation ,the level of WBC and neutrophil granulocyte of the laparotomy group rose ,which was obviously higher than that of the laparo- scopie group. Every index gradually returned to the normal on the third day after surgery, but the level of WBC in laparotomy group was still higher than that of the laparoseopy group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions:Compared with laparotomy,laparoscopy has advantages in the treatment of acute appendicitis, which mainly embody in the following aspects : smaller wound, shorter recovery time and hospital stay, less pain and systemic reaction but the treatment cost is relatively higher. So it is the most ideal operation choice for the patients who are economic prosperity and eager for less pain and shorter recovery time.
作者 车军
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2014年第2期138-140,共3页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 急性阑尾炎 腹腔镜检查 剖腹术 对比研究 Acute appendicitis Laparoscopy Laparotomy Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

  • 1胡三元,张光永,于文滨,李波,张海峰,王可新.腹腔内留置钛夹转归的实验研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(7):438-439. 被引量:34
  • 2中华医学会外科分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组.腹腔镜阑尾切除术常规[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2006,11(4):359-360. 被引量:117
  • 3姜万里,张宗杰,刘书信.腹腔镜阑尾切除术操作方法的探讨(附150例报告)[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2007,12(3):239-240. 被引量:7
  • 4Serum. Endoscopic appendectomy [ J ]. Endoscopy, 1983,15 ( 2 ) :59.
  • 5Yau KK,Siu WT,Tang CN,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis[J].J Am Coll Surg,2007,205(1):60-65.
  • 6Long KH,Bannon MP,Zietlow SP,et al.A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses[J].Surgery,2001,129(4):390-400.
  • 7Larsson PG,Henriksson G,Olsson M,et al.Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women.A randomized study[J].Surg Endosc,2001,15(2):200-202.
  • 8Sauerland S,Lefering R,Neugebauer EA.Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2004,18 (4):CD001546.
  • 9Garbutt JM,Soper NJ,Shannon WD,et al.Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc,1999,(1):17-26.
  • 10Ignacio RC,Burke R,Spencer D,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial[J].Surg Endosc,2004,18(2):334-337.

共引文献202

同被引文献222

  • 1殷金成,陈海群.小儿复杂性阑尾炎的腹腔镜治疗体会[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(8):458-459. 被引量:5
  • 2韩家发.高原阑尾炎119例临床分析[J].西南国防医药,2006,16(1):71-72. 被引量:5
  • 3中华医学会外科分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组.腹腔镜阑尾切除术常规[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2006,11(4):359-360. 被引量:117
  • 4吴盂超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:2105.
  • 5唐翠明,练敏,黄永红.老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床观察及护理[J].护士进修杂志,2007,22(19):1765-1766. 被引量:16
  • 6张震波.实用腔镜外科技术理论与实践.西安:陕西科技出版社,2011.10.
  • 7Korndorffer J R Jr,Fellinger E,Reed W.SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy[J].Surg Endosc,2010,24(4):757-761.
  • 8TUGGLE KR, ORTEGA G, BOLORUNDURO OB, et al. Laparo- scopic versus open appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: a review of the NSQIP database [J]. J Surg Res, 2010, 163(2):225-228.
  • 9MOORE CB, SMITH RS, HERBERTSON R, et al. Does use of intraoperative irrigation with open or laparoscopic appendectomy reduce post-operative intra-abdominal abscess[J]. Am Surg, 2011, 77(1): 78-80.
  • 10PADANKATTI LR, PRAMOD RK, GUPTA A, et al. Laparoscop- ic versus open appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: a prospective study [J]. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg, 2008, 13(3): 104-106.

引证文献54

二级引证文献359

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部