期刊文献+

^18F-FDGPET/CT对不同分级和分期滤泡性淋巴瘤诊断及预后评估的价值 被引量:14

Grading, staging and prognosis of follicular lymphoma: the value of ^18F-FDG PET/CT
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨^18F—FDGPET/CT对治疗前不同组织学分级及不同临床分期的滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)的诊断价值,及其对一线治疗后的预后评估作用。方法回顾性分析2007年5月至2013年4月经病理学证实的24例(男11例,女13例,中位年龄55岁)治疗前行^18F—FDGPET/CT显像的FL患者。将患者按不同组织学分级和临床分期进行分组,计算对各组的诊断效能,并采用析因设计的方差分析比较不同组患者的病灶SUVmax。将同期一线治疗后行^18F—FDGPET/CT显像的16例[男9例,女7例,中位年龄50.5岁;其中7例为前述治疗前也行显像的患者]按照PET/CT结果分为阳性组和阴性组,对患者进行随访(6~49个月)并评价预后。结果(1)24例患者中惰性FL(组织学分级1+2级)13例,侵袭性FL11例(组织学分级3级及2级伴DLBCL转化)。PET/CT显像诊断隋性FL和侵袭性FL患者的灵敏度分别为92.3%(12/13)和100%(11/11);SUVmax分别为5.26±1.70和9.54±5.09(F=5.196,P〈0.05);(2)PET/CT将AnnArbor分期为I-Ⅱ3例患者(12.5%,3/24)上调至Ⅲ~Ⅳ期,将2例患者(8.3%,2/24)的分期由Ⅲ~Ⅳ期下调至I-Ⅱ期。I~Ⅱ期和Ⅲ~Ⅳ期患者的SUV~分别为5.22+2.92和8.04+4.46(F=2.904,P〉0.05);(3)16例一线治疗后行PET/CT显像的FL患者中,PET/CT阴性和阳性患者分别为13和3例,2组6个月、1年及3年总生存率分别为100%(13/13)、9/9、4/5和2/3、2/3和1/2;无进展生存率分别为92.3%(12/13)、8/9、3/5和2/3、0/3和0/2。结论^18F—FDGPET/CT对治疗前不同组织学分级及不同临床分期的FL有较高的诊断价值。FL患者一线治疗后行^18F—FDGPET/CT检查可提示预后。 Objective To evaluate the value of 1SF-FDG PET/CT in histological grading and staging of follicular lymphoma (FL) and prediction of prognosis after first-line treatment. Methods From May 2007 to April 2013, 24 patients (11 males, 13 females; median age 55 years) with histopathological proof of FL were retrospectively studied. All patients were evaluated by ^18F-FDG PET/CT before the first-line treatment and were divided into indolent FL and aggressive FL according to their histological grades and clinical stages. The sensitivity, specificity and SUVmax were calculated. Analysis of variance of factorial design was used to analyze the data. Within the same study period, ^18F-FDG PET/CT was also performed in 16 FL patients (9 males, 7 females; median age 50.5 years) after first-line treatment (7/16 patients belonged to the aforementioned group with pretreatment PET/CT performed) ; and they were then divided into PET/CT- positive and PET/CT-negative groups. All 16 patients were followed for 6-49 months to evaluate the prognosis. The rates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Results ( 1 ) The sensitivities of PET/CT in indolent and aggressive FL were 92.3% ( 12/13 ) and 100% ( 11/11 ), respectively. The SUVmax was 5.26± 1.70 vs 9.54±5.09 (F= 5.196, P〈0.05). (2) According to PET/CT, 3 patients( 12.5% ,3/24) were upstaged from I - II to HI-IV, and 2 patients( 8.3% ,2/24) were downstaged from III - IV to I - II. The SUVmax of stage I - II and III - IV FL was 5.22± 2.92 and 8.04 ± 4.46 ( F = 2. 904, P〉0.05). (3)For the 16 FL patients with PET/CT after first-line treatment, the negative and positive groups had different OS and PFS. The 6-month OS, 1-year OS and 3-year OS were 100%(13/13) , 9/ 9, 4/5, respectively for the negative group, and 2/3, 2/3, 1/2, respectively for the positive group; while the corresponding 6-month PFS, 1-year PFS and 3-year PFS were 92.3% (12/13) , 8/9, 3/5 and 2/3, 0/3, 0/2, respectively. Conclusions 18F-FDG PET/CT is valuable in the evaluation of histological grading and clinical staging of FL patients and in the prediction of prognosis after fist-line treatment.
出处 《中华核医学与分子影像杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期23-26,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
关键词 淋巴瘤 滤泡型 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 体层摄影术 x线计算机 脱氧葡萄糖 Lymphoma, follicular Tomography, emission-computed Tomography, X-ray computed Deoxyglucose
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1中华医学会血液学分会;中国抗癌协会淋巴瘤专业委员会.中国滤泡性淋巴瘤诊断与治疗指南[J]中华血液学杂志,2011717-720.
  • 2孟祥睿,王华庆,任旭升,张会来,钱正子,周世勇.^(18)F-FDG PET-CT对滤泡性淋巴瘤诊断及预后评估的作用[J].中国实验诊断学,2012,16(12):2239-2242. 被引量:5
  • 3Cheson BD,Pfistner B,Juweid ME. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2007.579-586.
  • 4Henninger B,Putzer D,Kendler D. Diagnostic value of software-based image fusion of computed tomography and 18F-FDGPET scans in patients with malignant lymphoma[J].Science World Journal,2012.821694.
  • 5Wohrer S,Jaeger U,Kletter K. 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) visualizes follicular lymphoma irrespective of grading[J].Annals of Oncology,2006.780-784.
  • 6马林峰,樊卫.淋巴瘤病灶对^(18)F-FDG摄取与不同病理亚型的关系[J].癌症,2009,28(4):425-430. 被引量:13
  • 7Weiler-Sagie M,Bushelev O,Epelbaum R. 18F-FDG avidity in lymphoma readdressed:a study of 766 patients[J].Journal of Nuclear Medicine,2010.25-30.
  • 8Terasawa T,Nihashi T,Hotta T. 18F-FDG PET for posttherapy assessment of Hodgkin's disease and aggressive Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma:a systematic review[J].Journal of Nuclear Medicine,2008.13-21.
  • 9李洪生,吴湖炳,王全师,王巧愚,李葆元.^18F—FDG PET/CT评价弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤化疗中期的治疗反应[J].中华核医学杂志,2011,31(3):145-150. 被引量:12
  • 10Brepoels L,Stroobants S,Verhoef G. PET and PET/CT for response evaluation in lymphoma:current practice and developments[J].Leukemia & Lymphoma,2007.270-282.

二级参考文献32

  • 1管樑 ,Rebecca Elstrom ,Zhuang Hong-ming ,Stephen J.Schuster ,朱承谟 ,Abass Alavi .^(18)F-FDG PET显像对不同亚型淋巴瘤的诊断价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2004,24(4):207-209. 被引量:9
  • 2Thill R, Neuerburg J, Fabry U, et al. Comparison of findings with ^18F-FDG PET and CT in pretherapeutic staging of malignant lymphoma [J]. Nukearmedizin, 1997,36(7) :234-239.
  • 3FreudenbergL S, Antoch G, Schutt P, et al. FDG PET-CT in restaging of patients with lymphoma [J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2004,31 (3) : 325-329.
  • 4Allen-Auerbach M, Quon A, Weber WA, et al. Comparison between 2-deoxy-2- [ ^18F] fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography computed tomography hardware fusion for staging of patients with lymphoma [J]. Mol Imaging Biol, 2004,6(6):411-416.
  • 5Chenson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. Revised response criterian for malignant lymphoma [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25 (5):1-8.
  • 6Yoshioka T, Takahashi H, Oikawa H, et al. Accumulation of 2-deoxy-2 [^18F] fluoro-D-glucose in human cancers heterotrasplanted in nude mice: comparison between histology and glycolytic status [ J ]. Nucl Med, 1994,35 ( 1 ) : 97-103.
  • 7Hoffmann M, Kletter K, Diemling M, et al . Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (^18F-FDG) does not visualize extranodal B2 cell lymphoma of the mucosa- associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type [J]. Ann Oncol, 1999,10(10) : 1185-1189.
  • 8Wagner M, Seitz U, Buck A, et al. 3'-[^18F]fluoro-3'- deoxythymidine ([^18F]-FLT) as positron emission tomography tracer for imaging proliferation in a murine B-cell lymphoma model and in the human disease [J]. Cancer Res, 2003,63 (10) : 2681-2687.
  • 9Juweid ME,Stroobants S,Hoekstra OS,et al.Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma:consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma.J Clin Oncol,2007,25:571-578.
  • 10Cheson BD,Pfistner B,Juweid ME,et al.Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma.J Clin Oncol,2007,25:579-586.

共引文献26

同被引文献103

  • 1Juweid ME. FDG-PET/CT in lymphoma [J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2011,727 : 1-19.
  • 2Wahl RL,Jacene H,Kasamon Y,et al. From RECIST to PERCIST:evolving considerations for PET response crite- ria in solid tumors[J]. J Nucl Med,2009,50 Suppl 1:122S - 150S.
  • 3Buyse M,Thirion P,Carlson RW,et al. Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer:a meta-analysis. Meta-analysis group in cancer[J]. Lancet, 2000,356(9227): 373-378.
  • 4Ha-Kawa S,Ueno Y. Intussusception caused by an ileoce- cal lymphoma disclosed on 18F-FDG-PET/CT [J]. Intern Med, 2013,52(7) : 827-828.
  • 5Jerusalem G,Hustinx R,Beguin Y,et al. Evaluation of therapy for lymphoma[J]. Semin Nuel Med,2005,35(3): 186-196.
  • 6Mikhaeel NG. Interim fluorodeoxyglucose positron emis- sion tomography for early response assessment in diffuse large B cell lymphoma:where are we now?[J]. Leuk Lym- phoma, 2009,50(12) : 1931-1936.
  • 7Juweid ME,Stroobants S,Hoekstra OS,et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of In- ternational Harmonization Project in lymphoma [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25(5) :571-578.
  • 8Casasnovas RO,Meignan M,Berriolo-Riedinger A,et al. SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of in- terim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Blood, 2011,118(1) : 37-43.
  • 9Itti E,Juweid ME,Haioun C ,et al. Improvement of early 18F-FDG PET interpretation in diffuse large B-cell lym- phoma:importance of the reference background[J]. J Nucl Med,2010,51(12): 1857-1862.
  • 10Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, et al. FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and pro- gression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma[J]. Blood, 2006 r 107(1) :52-59.

引证文献14

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部