期刊文献+

3.0T磁共振脑转移瘤IVIM与MR灌注加权成像的相关性研究 被引量:9

A study of IVIM and PWI of brain metastases at 3.0T MR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 初步探讨利用体素内不一致运动磁共振成像(introvoxelincoherent motion MR imaging,IVIM-MRI)评价脑转移瘤的灌注,并与灌注加权成像(perfusion weighted Imaging,PWI)的指标进行相关性评价.方法 收集在本院2012年6月~2012年12月间26例经手术证实的不同类型癌症发生脑转移的患者行MRI增强检查.扫描序列包括IVIM及PWI.选取颅内转移病灶共60个,应用工作站后处理软件分别测定瘤体及对侧Slow ADC(SADC)、Fast ADC (FADC)、Fraction of FastADC(FFADC)和血流量(cerebral blood flow,CBF)、血容量(cerebral blood volume,CBV),并计算出各个参数的相对值(r),即:r值=(实质病灶值/对侧正常值)×100%.将瘤体与正常侧的IVIM指标进行统计学比较,并将IVIM与PWI的各参数进行Pearson相关性分析.对IVIM和PWI的参数进行转移瘤诊断的ROC分析.结果 转移瘤的SADC为(0.437±0.023)×10-3 mm2/s),其对侧脑组织的SADC为(0.223±0.010)×10-3mm2/s),两者间差异有统计学意义(t=4.83,P<0.01);转移瘤的FADC为(3.65±0.11)×10-3 mm2/s),其对侧脑组织的FADC为(2.27±0.12)×10-3 mm2/s),两者间差异有统计学意义(t =8.36,P<0.05);转移瘤的FFADC为441.67×10-3±21.19×10-3,其对侧脑组织的FFADC为276.5×10-3±8.07×104,两者间差异有统计学意义(t =7.28,P<0.01).转移瘤的rFADC为5.57士31.66,rCBV为2.79±1.27,Person相关性分析显示rFADC与rBV呈弱相关(r=0.274,P<0.05),而rFFADC、rSADC与rCBF、rCBV无明显相关性.FADC、FFADC、SADC、CBF、CBV的ROC曲线分析显示,AUCFADC=0.924(P=0.025);AUCFFADC=0.860(P=0.034);AUCSADC=0.896(P=0.030);AUCCBF=0.849(P =0.035);AUCCBV=0.865(P=0.034).FADC的ROC曲线的AUC最大,诊断准确性更高.结论 IVIM的参数测量能反映转移瘤的灌注特性,但是由于与PWI的技术原理不同,灌注的测量指标之间只具有弱相关性. Objective Preliminary study IVIM-MRI to evaluate the perfusion of brain metastases,and indicate the relevance evaluation with PWI.Methods Twenty-seven patients with metastatic encephaloma from different types of cancer confirmed by surgery between 2012-6 and 2012-12 underwent MRI enhanced inspections.Primary tumor of lung adenocarcinoma in 18 cases,squamous cell carcinoma of the lung in 2 cases,breast cancer in 2 cases,non-small cell lung carcinoma in 1 case,renal cell carcinoma in 1 case,colon cancer in 1 case,small cell lung cancer in 1 case.Obtain IVIM and PWI images.60 intracranial and 60 contralateral metastatic lesions were selected,and determined the slow ADC Bi (SADCBi),Fast ADC Bi (FADCBi),Fraction of Fast ADC mono (FFADC),Fast ADC mono (FADC) and blood flow and blood volume in PWI respectively using the multi ADC Analysis Algorithms and BrainStat GVF coming with the MRI machine.Got the r value,and r =(parenchyma lesions value/ the contralateral normal value)× 100%.The IVIM and PWI values were compared by pearson correlation analysis.P <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.Results The SADC value of the brain metastasis tumors is (0.437±0.023) × 10-3 mm2/s) and the FFADC value of the contralateral brain tissue is 0.223 × 10-3 ± 0.010 × 10 3.There is statistically significant difference between them (t =4.83,P <0.01).The FADC value of brain metastasis tumors is (2.27±0.12) × 10-3 mm2/s)and the contralateral is (2.27±0.12) × 10-3 mm2/s).There is statistically significant difference between them (t =8.36,P <0.05).The FFADC value of the brain metastasis tumors is 441.67 × 10-3 ±21.19 × 10-3 and the FFADC value of the contralateral brain tissue is 276.5 × 10-3 ± 8.07 × 10-3.There is statistically significant difference between them (t =7.28,P <0.01).The rFastADCmono(rFADC)value of the brain metastasis tumors is 5.57±31.66 and the bloodvolume value is 2.79±1.27.The rFADC and rCBV values have weak correlation (r =0.274,P <0.05,but the rFFADC,rSADC,rCBF and rCBV values have no significant correlation.The FADC,FFADC,SADC,CBF,CBV ROC curve analysis showed that AUCFADC=0.924 (P =0.025),AUCFFADC=0.860 (P =0.034),AUCSADC=0.896 (P =0.030),AUCCBF=0.849(P =0.035)and AUCCBV=0.865(P =0.034).Conclusion IVIM parameter measurement can reflect the perfusion characteristics of metastatic tumor.But due to the different from PWI technology principle,it only has a weak correlation between perfusion measurement indicators.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2014年第3期337-341,共5页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 脑转移瘤 磁共振 体素内不一致运动磁共振成像 灌注加权成像 Brain metastasis tumors MR imaging Introvoxelincoherent motion MR imaging Perfusion weighted imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Aaron R, Geoffrey S. Cerebral perfusion imaging [J]. Semin Neurol, 2012, 32(4): 454-465.
  • 2Copen WA, Schaefer PW. MR perfusion imaging in acute is- chemic stroke [J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2011, 21(2): 259-238.
  • 3Ichiro Y, Winn A, Yoshiro H, et al. Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepaticlesions: evaluationwithintravox- elincoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging [J]. Radiology, 1999, 210(3): 617-623.
  • 4Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, et al. Intracranial mass le- sions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptilility-weighted ech o-planar perfusion MR imaging [J]. Radiology, 2002, 223 (1) : 11-29.
  • 5Kimura T, Sako K, Tanaka K, et al. Evaluation of the re- sponse of metastatic brain tumors to stereotactic radiosurgery by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 201TIC1 single- photon emission computerized tomography, and gadolinium- enhanced magnetic resonance imaging [J]. J Neurosurg,2004, 100(5): 835-841.
  • 6Huang BY, Lester K, Maurieio C, et al. Association of cho- line levels and tumor perfusion in brain metastases assessed with proton MR spectroscopy and dynamic susceptibility con- trast-enhanced perfusion weighted MRI [J]. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010, 9(6) : 327-337.
  • 7Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR imaging of intravoxelincoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders [J]. Radiology, 1986, 161 (2) : 401-407.
  • 8Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M, et al. Liver cirrhosis: in- travoxel incoherent motion Mrimaging-pilot study [J]. Radi- ology, 2008, 249(3): 891-899.
  • 9Hiroshi S, Chiharu T, Shigeyoshi G, et al. An intravoxel in- coherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging study of prostate cancer [J]. AJR, 2012, 199(4): 496-500.
  • 10Ostergaard L. Principles of cerebral perfusion imaging by bo- lus tracking [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2005, 22(6) : 710-717.

二级参考文献15

  • 1ChiangIC KuoYT LuCY YeungKW LinWC SheuFO LiuGC.Distinction between high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases using peritumoral 3-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion, and perfusion imagings[J].中国神经肿瘤杂志,2004,2(3):202-202. 被引量:31
  • 2牛广明,高阳,韩晓东.磁共振灌注成像在颅内星形细胞瘤诊断中的价值[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2007,39(4):398-401. 被引量:1
  • 3Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Perfusion - sensitive MR imaging of gliomas: comparison between gradient - echo and spin - echo echo - planar imaging techniques[J]. AJNR, 2001,22(8): 1306 -1315.
  • 4Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, et al. Dynamic contrast - enhanced T2 * - weighted MR imaging of recurrent malignant gliomas treated with thalidomide and carboplatin[J].AJNR 2000,21(5):881 -890.
  • 5Knopp EA, Cha S, Johnson G, et al. Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast - enhanced T2 * - weighted MR imaging[J].Radiology,1999,211(6):791-798.
  • 6Wong JC, Provenzale JM, Petrella JR. Perfusion MR imaging of brain neoplasms[J].A JR,2000,174(4):1147 - 1157.
  • 7Henry RG, Vigneron DB, Fischbein NJ, et al. Comparison of relative cerebral blood volume and proton spectroscopy in patients with treated gliomas[J]. AJNR, 2000,21(2):357 -366.
  • 8Verstraete KL, Deene YD, Roels A, et al. Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions dynamic contrast - enhanced MR imaging parametric"first - pass"images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion[J]. Radiology,1994,192(3):835 - 843.
  • 9Hazle JD, Jackson EF, Schomer DF,et al. Dynamic imaging of intracranial lesions using fast spin - echo imaging : differentiation of brain tumors and treatment effects[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,1997,7(6):1084 - 1093.
  • 10Nelson SJ, Nat DR. Imaging of brain tumors after therapy[J]. Neuroimging Clin N Am, 1999,9(4):801 -819.

共引文献16

同被引文献121

  • 1Sasitorn Petcharunpaisan,Joana Ramalho,Mauricio Castillo.Arterial spin labeling in neuroimaging[J].World Journal of Radiology,2010,2(10):384-398. 被引量:23
  • 2张劲松,宦怡,常英娟,葛雅丽,赵海涛,魏梦绮.扩散加权成像在高分化胶质瘤和转移瘤中的鉴别价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(10):1013-1017. 被引量:21
  • 3张皓,沈天真,陈星荣,缪竞陶,解学乾.MR灌注成像在鉴别单发脑转移瘤与高级别胶质瘤中的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(4):393-396. 被引量:25
  • 4张思维,陈万青,孔灵芝,李连弟,鲁凤珠,李光琳,孟佳,赵平.中国部分市县1998~2002年恶性肿瘤的发病与死亡[J].中国肿瘤,2006,15(7):430-448. 被引量:171
  • 5顾方六.吴阶平泌尿外科学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2004:898-918.
  • 6Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR imaging of introvoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorder. Radiology, 1986, 161(2): 401-407.
  • 7Jensen H, Helpem JA, Ramani A, et al. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2005, 53(6): 1432- 1440.
  • 8Jensen JH, Helpem JA. MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kutosis analysis. NMR Biomed, 2010, 23(7): 698-710.
  • 9Wu EX, Cheung MM. MR diffusion kurtosis imaging for neural tissue characterization. NMR Biomed, 2010, 23(7): 836-848.
  • 10Ichiron Y, Winn A, Yoshiro H, et al. Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepaticlesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology, 1999, 210(3): 617-623.

引证文献9

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部