摘要
目的观察UPDRS评分、Hoehn-Yahr评分、PDQ-39评分、Schwab-England评分的拟合度。方法选取2006.1-2008.12海军总医院神经外科收治的帕金森患者21例,男15例,女6例,平均年龄57.33岁。采用UPDRS、Hoehn-Yahr、PDQ-39和Schwab-England方法评估帕金森患者的神经功能缺失和生活质量。线性回归检验后三个评分信度、效度以及UPDRS的拟合度。结果 UPDRS、Hoehn-Yahr、PDQ-39和SchwabEngland具有明显的拟合度。Hoehn-Yahr、PDQ-39和Schwab-England与UPDRS中的各项评分拟合度均良好。结论在本组帕金森病患者中,Hoehn-Yahr、PDQ-39和Schwab-England与UPDRS一样是有效、可信的评价方法。
Objective To evaluate the reliability, validity of Unified Parkinson＇s Disease Rating Scale （UPDRS）, Hoehn-- Yahr, Parkinson＇s Disease Questionnaire-- 39 （PDQ-- 39） and Schwab--England in Parkinson Disease. Methods A total of 21 Parkinson＇s disease patients in General Navy Hospital, including 15 males and 6 females, aged 42-79, mean aged 57 years, from 2006. 1 -- 2008. 12. UPDRS, Hoehn-- Yahr, PDQ-- 39 and Schwab-- England were used to evaluate those Parkinson patients＂ neural function. Linear regression was used to To evaluate the reliabili- ty, validity, goodness--of--fit of them. Results The reproducibility was same between Hoehn-- Yahr,PDQ--39, Schwab--England and UPDRS, and all those scales revealed similar correlation with disease severity. Conclusion Unified Parkinson＇s Disease Rating Scale （UPDRS）, Hoehn-- Yahr, PDQ-- 39 and Schwab-- England were reliable, valid in Parkinson Disease.
出处
《立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志》
2013年第6期328-330,共3页
Chinese Journal of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
