期刊文献+

全心舒张末期容量指数及脉压变异预测感染性休克继发ALI容量反应性 被引量:20

GEDVI and PPV predict fluid responsiveness in patients with ALI secondary to septic shock
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究PICCO(脉波指示剂连续心输出量监测)技术预测感染性休克继发ALI(急性肺损伤)患者容量反应性的价值。方法前瞻性观察性研究2010年1月至2012年2月江苏省苏北人民医院重症医学科(ICU)收治的感染性休克继发ALI患者42例,入ICU1h、6h,24h分别进行容量负荷试验。根据容量负荷试验前后SVI增加值是否大于15%分为有反应组和无反应组,比较容量负荷试验有反应者和无反应者间CVP(中心静脉压),SVV(每搏量变异),PPV(脉压变异),GEDVI(全心舒张末期容量指数)及ITBI(胸腔内血容量指数)的差异,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定CVP,SVV,PPV,GEDVI及ITBI判断容量反应性的阈值。结果(1)入ICU1h以GEDVI〈643.5mL/m^2及PPV〉13.5%评价感染性休克继发ALI患者容量反应性,灵敏度为90.9%,特异度为91.9%%(P〈0.01)。(2)人ICU6h以GEDVI〈559.0mL/m^2评价感染性休克继发ALI患者容量反应性,灵敏度为100%,特异度为62.5%(P〈0.01)。入ICU24hCVP,SVV,PPV,GEDVI及ITBI对容量均无反应性(P〉0.05)。结论GEDVI及PPV可作为评价感染性休克继发ALI患者早期容量反应性指标。 Objective To evaluate PICCO (pulse indicator continuous cardiac output) to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Methods We conducted a prospective study on 42 patients with acute lung injury secondary to septic shock, global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV) , central vein pressure (CVP) and other haemodynamic data were recorded before and after fluid administration of 500 mL of 6% hydroxyethyl starch. Responders were defined as patients with an increase in stroke volume index of at least 15% after fluid loading. Performance of variables was analyzed using receiver operator characteristics analysis. Results GEDVI and PPV, but not SVV and CVP, were able to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with acute lung injury secondary to septic shock 1 hrs after admission to intensive care unit (ICU). The best area under the ROC curve (AUC) was found for GEDVI ( AUC 0. 802, P 〈 0.01 ) and PPV ( AUC 0. 752, P 〈0. 01 ) ; the optimal cut-off of GEDVI and PPV were 643.5 mL/m2 and 13.5%, respectively. At this cut point, the sensitivity was 90. 9%, the specificity was 91.9%, however, only GEDVI was able to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with acute lung injury secondary to septic shock 6hrs after admission to ICU. The best area under the ROC curve (AUC) was found for GEDVI ( AUC 0. 788, P 〈 0. 01 ) . the GEDVI 〈 559 mL/m2 during loading were found to predict volume responsiveness with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 62. 5%. Conclusions GEDVI and PPV predict flui.d responsiveness in patients with acute lung injury secondary to septic shock in the early hours.
出处 《中华急诊医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期267-272,共6页 Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金 江苏省“333高层次人才培养工程”基金(2007)
关键词 感染性休克 急性肺损伤 容量反应性 全心舒张末期容量指数 脉压变异 Septic shock Acute lung injury: Fluid responsiveness: Global end-diastolic volumeindex Pulse pressure variation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1AISOUS F, Khalniees M, DeGirolamo A, et al. Negative fluid halalice predicts survival in patients with septic shock: a retrospeetive pilot study[J]. Chest, 2000, 117 (6): 1749.
  • 2Brun C, Zieleskiewicz L, Textoris J, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in severe preeclamptic patients with oliguria [ J ]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39 (4) : 593-030.
  • 3Claire V, Murphy, Pharm D, et al. The importance of fluidmanagement in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock [ J ]. Chest, 2009, 136 (1): 102-109.
  • 4Rivers E, Nguyen B, HAVSTAD S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock [ J ]. N Engl Med, 2001, 345 (11): 1368-1377.
  • 5Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury [J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354 (24): 2564-2575.
  • 6Cherpanath TG, Geerts BF, Lagrand WK, et al. Basic concepts of fluid responsiveness [J]. Neth Heart J, 2013 , 21 (12): 530-536.
  • 7Maxime C, Yannick LM, Christoph K. et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness [J]. Anesthesiology, 2011, 115 (2): 231-241.
  • 8Renner J, Brech O, Duetsehke P. et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants and neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery [J]. BrJ Anaesth, 2012, 108 (1): 108-115.
  • 9Broch O, Renner J, Grueuewald M. Variation of left ventrictdar outflowtract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients [ J ]. J Crit Care, 2012, 27 (3): 325. e7-13.
  • 10Umgelter A, Wagner K, Reindl W, et all. Haemodynamic effects of plasma-expansion with hyperoncotic albumin in cirrhotic patients with renal failure: a prospective interventional study[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2008, 27 (8) : 39.

同被引文献192

  • 1王祥瑞.危重患者肺水监测方法学及其意义[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(14):4011-4014. 被引量:3
  • 2王兴鹏,李兆申,袁耀宗,杜奕奇,曾悦.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2013,上海)[J].中国实用内科杂志,2013,33(7):530-535. 被引量:429
  • 3张宝宁,张磊,雷军荣,何勇,蔺军芳,张卫达,王晓武.法洛四联症根治术117例[J].第四军医大学学报,2006,27(5):480-480. 被引量:9
  • 4Barr J, Fraser, Gilles L, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for theManagement of pain, Agitation and Delirium in Adult Patients in the intensive Care Unit[J]. Critical care medicine, 2013, 41(1):278- 280.
  • 5Sanfilippo F, Corredor C, Fletcher N, et al. Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in septic patients: a systematic review and meta- analysis[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2015, 32(6): 799-807.
  • 6Backer D, Taccone F S, Holsten R, et al. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients [J]. Anesthesiology, 2009, 110(5):1092-1097.
  • 7da Silva Ramos F J, de Oliveira E M, Park M, et al. Heart-lung interactions with different ventilatory settings during acute lung in- jury and hypovolaemia: an experimental study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2011, 106(3):394-402.
  • 8De Backer D, Ospina-Tascon, Salgado D, et al. Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patients=current methods and future approaches[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2010, 36(11 ):1813- 1825.
  • 9Dossett LA, Redhage LA, Sawyer RG, et al. Revisiting the validity of APACHE II in the trauma tCU: improved risk stratification in crit- ically injured adults[J]. Injury, 2009, 40(9):993-998.
  • 10Samir M. Fakhry, Brad Martin, Hasan A1 Harakeh, et al. Proportional Costs in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Patients: Dominant Role of Intensive Care Unit Costs[J]. Journal of the American College of Sur- geons,2013, 216(4):607-614.

引证文献20

二级引证文献127

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部