“陈■车辖”铭文辨伪

Authenticity of Inscriptions on Two “Chen Jin” Linchpins

《殷周金文集成》12023号、12024号著录两件车辖铭文拓本,其中12024号车辖原器为罗振玉旧藏。本文指出,车辖铭文在内容上与《殷周金文集成》11036号"陈■散戈"十分相近,对戈铭中"■"、"散"两形体的旧有释读意见进行了归纳总结,并分析了戈铭所表达的含义即此戈为齐国贵族"陈■"所有或由其督造的"杀伐之戈"。在厘清11036号戈铭文释读及含义的基础上,对车辖铭文的书写风格与内容进行了考察,指出铭文本身存在着很多疑点,并从辖铭"散"字书写方向、"月"讹作"夕"、文字笔画完整性及铭文含义等方面进行了分析论证,从而认为车辖铭文很可能是根据《殷周金文集成》11036号"陈散戈"铭文伪作的。本文还讨论了《山东金文集成》著录的两件"陈散戈"及《殷周金文集成》11591号"陈■散造剑"铭文真伪问题。

The rubbings of inscriptions on two vehicle linchpins are published in A Collection of Yin and Zhou Bronze Inscriptions as No. 12023 and No. 12024 （The original linchpin of No. 12024 was previously in the Luo Zhenyu private collection）. The inscriptions are similar to No. 11036 in the same book ＂陈窒散戈＂. The author reviews previous interpretations about ＂窒＂ and ＂散＂ and contends that the ge bearing the inscription ＂陈窒散戈＂ was either owned by a Qi state noble man Chen Jin or commissioned by him as weapon. Based on the inscription of this ge, the script and meaning of the inscriptions on the linchpins are analyzed. It is found that the inscriptions are problematic and are probably reproductions after ＂陈窒散戈＂. In this paper, the authenticity of two ge inscribed with ＂陈窒散戈＂ in A Collection of Bronze Inscriptions from Shandong Province and 陈窒造剑＂ （No.11591） in A Collection of Yin and Zhou Bronze Inscriptions are discussed as well.