期刊文献+

不同手术方式治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较 被引量:26

Comparative Analysis of Four Different Operation Methods for Treatment of Complex Upper Ureteral Calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较输尿管镜碎石术(URL)、微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)、后腹腔镜下输尿管上段切开取石术(RLU)、开放输尿管切开取石(UL)治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的疗效.方法回顾性分析2005年1月至2013年1月收治的281例复杂性输尿管上段结石患者,其中48例采用URL,113例采用MPCNL,67例采用RLU,53例采用UL.结果一次治疗成功率:URL 62.5%(30/48),MPCNL 92.9%(105/113),RLU 100%(67/67),UL 100%(53/53),P<0.05.术中出血量:URL(9.2±1.4)mL,MPCNL(72.5±5.8)mL,RLU(43.1±8.5)mL,UL(100.5±9.2)mL,P<0.05.手术时间:URL组(30.0±8.6)min短于其他3组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).平均住院日:URL组(4.2±1.2)d,明显短于其他3组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);4组的术后并发症有差异但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论在复杂性输尿管上段结石治疗中,应综合考虑患者的临床情况与个人要求制定个性化的治疗方案. Objective To compare the effects of ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL), minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy ( MPCNL) , retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy ( RLU) and open ureterolithotomy (UL) for the treatment of complex upper ureteral calculi. Methods The data of 281 patients with complex upper ureteral calculi from January 2005 to January 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. 48 patients of them received treatment of URL, 113 patients received MPCNL, 67 patients received RLU and other 53 patients received UL. Results Success rates of treatment at the first time were:URL 62.5% (30/48), MPCNL 92.9%(105/113),RLU 100%(67/67) and UL 100%(53/53) . The mean blood losses during the operation were:URL (9.2 ± 1.4) mL,MPCNL (72.5 ± 5.8) mL,RLU (43.1 ± 8.5) mL and UL (100.5 ± 9.2) mL. The average operation time of URL group was shorter than three other groups, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈 0.05) . The average hospital stay of URL group was also shorter than three other groups ( P〈 0.05) . The difference was not statistically significant in complications among four groups after operation ( P〈0.05) . Conclusion Clinical characteristics of patients and individual require ment should be considered comprehensively before an individual treatment choice is made for the treatment of complex upper ureteral calculi.
出处 《昆明医科大学学报》 CAS 2014年第2期73-76,共4页 Journal of Kunming Medical University
基金 四川省卫生厅科研基金资助项目(130212)
关键词 输尿管结石 碎石术 经皮肾镜 输尿管镜 腹腔镜 切开取石术 Ureteral calculi Lithotripsy Percutaneous nephroscopy Ureteroscopy Laparoscopy Ureterolithotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献56

  • 1张慕淳,孔祥波,张刚,郑泽霖.输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石术治疗复杂上尿路结石[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(8):810-811. 被引量:22
  • 2祖雄兵,张晓波,齐琳,申鹏飞,叶章群.后腹腔镜技术治疗输尿管结石的临床价值[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(2):104-106. 被引量:46
  • 3李维国,夏术阶,朱轶勇,孙晓文,凡杰,鲁军,唐孝达.输尿管结石三种治疗方法的比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(2):124-125. 被引量:94
  • 4黄东龙,陈彤,刘红艳,张轶庠.微创手术治疗输尿管上段结石256例报告[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(6):412-413. 被引量:9
  • 5Hemal AK, Goel A, Goel R. Minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy[ J ]. J Urol,2003,169 (2) :480-482.
  • 6Turk TM ,Jenkins AD. A comparison of ureteroscopy to in Situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi [ J ]. J Urol, 1999,161 ( 1 ) :45-47.
  • 7Goel R, Aron M, Kesars-ani PK, et al, Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: still the treatment of choice in developing countries[ J]. J Endour, 2005, 19 (1):54- 57.
  • 8FENG MI, T AMADDON K, MIKHAIL A, et al. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of pereutaneoune phrolithotomy[J]. Urol, 2001, 58: 345-350.
  • 9YIP KH, LEE CW, TAM PC. Holmium laser lithotrlpsy for ureteral, calculi: An outpatient procedure [J]. J Endourol, 1998, 12: 241-246.
  • 10WEIN, KAVOUSSI, NOVICK, et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology[M].郭应禄,周利群,主译.坎贝尔外科学.北京大学医学出版社,2009:1599-1600.

共引文献104

同被引文献196

引证文献26

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部