期刊文献+

割手密种质资源的营养价值评价 被引量:1

Nutrition value evaluation of Saccharum spontaneum L. germplasm resource
下载PDF
导出
摘要 测定43份割手密种质营养期干物质、粗脂肪、粗蛋白、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、粗灰分、钙和磷等8个营养指标,以粗蛋白、粗脂肪、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维和磷钙作为判断指标,用层次分析法对其营养价值进行评价。结果表明:营养价值最高的为A49(广西),其干物质、粗蛋白、粗脂肪、粗灰分、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、钙和磷的含量分别为32.35%、7.20%、4.06%、8.07%、75.81%、50.72%、0.23%和0.16%;营养价值最低的为A3(广东),其干物质、粗蛋白、粗脂肪、粗灰分、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、钙和磷的含量分别为32.24%、4.62%、0.51%、6.38%、46.40%、40.02%、0.15%和0.09%。各种质材料间的粗蛋白含量差异显著,最高的A48(9.11%)是最低的A14(3.72%)的2.4倍,并将43份种质分为高营养型、中等营养型和低营养型3类,旨在为割手密作为饲草应用提供理论依据。 The dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, crude ash, P and Ca was tested in the paper. The nutritional quality evaluation by AHP with crude protein, crude fat, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and P and Ca showed the 43 germplasms could be devided into three categories: high, ordinary, and low nutritional quality. The test showed that A49 had the highest nutrition value, which including 32.35% gross dry matter, 7.20% crude protein, 4.06% crude fat, 8.07% crude ash, 75.81% neutral detergent fiber, 50.72% acid detergent fiber, 0.23% P and 0.23% Ca. Besides, the tset also indicated that A3 had the lowest nutrition value, which consisted of 32.24% gross dry matter, 4.62% crude protein, 0.51 % crude fat, 6.38% crude ash, 46.40% neutral detergent fiber, 40.02% acid detergent fiber, 0.15% P and 0.09% Ca. The purpose of discussing the nutritional value of Saccharum spontaneum L. in this paper was to provide the theoretical basis of Saccharum spontaneum L. as forage grass.
出处 《广东农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期19-24,共6页 Guangdong Agricultural Sciences
基金 农业部物种资源保护"热带牧草种质资源保存"项目 农业部现代农业人才支撑计划项目-热带牧草创新与利用 农业部热带作物种质资源保护项目(12RZZY-09)
关键词 割手密 中性洗涤纤维 营养价值 评价 Saccharum spontaneuni L. neutral detergent fiber nutrition value evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献83

共引文献273

同被引文献28

  • 1李红梅,万小荣,何生根.植物水孔蛋白最新研究进展[J].生物化学与生物物理进展,2010,37(1):29-35. 被引量:24
  • 2ZHANG J S, NAGM C, YU Q Y, et al. Genome size variation in three Saccharum species[J]. Euphytica, 2012,185(3) :511 -519.
  • 3林日坚,刘水娣.甘蔗属拔地那和崖城割手密(Spontaneum)核型的比较研究[J].甘蔗糖业,1986(8):9-12.
  • 4MARCONI T G, COSTA E A, MIRANDA H R, et al. Functional markers for gene mapping and genetic diversity studies in sugarcane [ J 1- BMC Research Notes, 2011,4: 264.
  • 5CRESTE S, ACCORONI K A G, PINTO L R, et al. Genetic variability among sugarcane genotypes based on polymorphisms in sucrose metabolism and drought tolerance genes[ J]. Euphytiea, 2010,172(3) :435-446.
  • 6HU J G, VICK B A. Targetregion amplification polymorphism: a novel marker technique for plant genotyping[J]. Plant Mo- lecular Biology Reporter, 2003,21 ( 3 ) : 289-294.
  • 7POCZAI P, VARGA I, LAOS M, et al. Advances in plant gene-targeted and functional markers: a review [ J ]. Plant Meth- ods, 2013,9:6.
  • 8GUPTA P K, BUSTGI S. Molecular markers from the transcribed/expressed region of the genome in higher plants [ J ]. Func- tional & Integrative Genomics, 2004,4(3) :139-162.
  • 9ALWALA S, SUMAN A, ARRO J A, et al. Target region amplification polymorphism (TRAP) for assessing genetic diversity in sugarcane germplasm collections [ J ]. Crop Science, 2005,46 ( 1 ) :448-455.
  • 10贺道华,雷忠萍,邢宏宜.功能标记的开发、特点和应用研究进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(1):110-116. 被引量:11

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部