期刊文献+

污灌区浅层地下水污染风险评价研究 被引量:26

Study on risk assessment of groundwater pollution in sewage irrigation area
原文传递
导出
摘要 以污灌区土壤作为风险源,以地下水系统作为风险受体,建立了包含地下水脆弱性、地下水特征污染物容量指数及土壤特征污染物潜在生态危害指数的地下水污染风险评价概念模型。以太原市小店污灌区为例,利用该模型对浅层地下水污染风险进行评价。结果表明:污灌区地下水脆弱性相对较低,特征污染物分布较为集中;受含水层脆弱性指数、特征污染物容量指数及潜在生态危害指数的影响,污灌区浅层地下水污染风险高低分布不均,较高污染风险区和高风险区分布在西吴、贾家寨、梁家庄等村庄以及汾河、萧河沿岸一带,占区域面积的31%。研究成果可为污灌区地下水污染风险分区提供参考依据。 Study on the risk of groundwater pollution in sewage irrigation area is of great importance to protect water and soil resources. Treating the soil in sewage irrigation area as the risk source and groundwater system as the risk receptor, a risk assessment model including aquifer vulnerability, typical groundwater pol- lutants capacity index, and potential ecological risk index of typical soil pollutants has been established. The model is applied to evaluate the shallow groundwater pollution risk for the Xiaodian sewage irrigation area. The results show that the vulnerability of groundwater is relatively lower with a concentrated distribu- tion of pollutants. Besides, influenced by typical pollutants capacity index, potential ecological risk index and aquifer vulnerability, the shallow groundwater pollution risk is unevenly distributed. The areas with high- er risk and high risk are mainly distributed in Xiwu, Jiajiazhai, Liangjiazhuang and along the bank of Fen- he River and Xiaohe River, covering 31% of the region. The results provide a reference for future studies on the risk assessment of groundwater pollution in sewage irrigation area.
出处 《水利学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期326-334,342,共10页 Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
基金 国家科技部创新基金(12C26213714122) 山西省水利科学技术研究项目(2012KW3603)
关键词 风险评价 地下水污染 污灌区 容量指数 脆弱性 生态危害指数 risk assessment groundwater pollution sewage irrigation area volume index vulnerability ecological risk index
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Abdellah A, Rababah, Nicholas J, Ashboh . Innovative production treatment hydroponic farm for primary munici- pal sewage utilization[J] . Water Resource, 2000, 34-(3) : 825-834.
  • 2曾德付,朱维斌.我国污水灌溉存在问题和对策探讨[J].干旱地区农业研究,2004,22(4):221-224. 被引量:34
  • 3Burkart M R, Kolpin D W, James D E . Assessing groundwater vulnerability to agrichemical contamination ill the Midwest[J] .Water Science technol, 1999, 39(3) : 103-112 .
  • 4Thapinta A, Hudak P F . Use of geographic information systems for assessing groundwater pollution potential bypesticides in central Thailand[J] . Environmental International, 2003, 29( 1 ) : 87-93.
  • 5Jaroslav V, Alexander Z . Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability [ M]//International Contributions to Hydrogeology Founded by G . Castany, E . Groba, E . Romijn . Hanover: Heise, 1994:131 .
  • 6Hrkal Z, Trouillard J M . Use of GIS for optimization human activity in a catchment area: A example of the Beauee region(France) . Environmental Geology, 1994, 24:22-27 .
  • 7Lynch S D , Reynders A G . A DRASTIC approach to groundwater vulnerability in South Africa[J] . South Afri- can Journal of Science, 1997, 93(2) : 59-60 .
  • 8National Researeh Council (U.S.) . Ground water vulnerability assessment predicting relative contamination poten- tial under conditions of uncertainty [M] . Committee on Techniques for Assessing Ground Water vulnerability, 1993 .
  • 9Secunda S, Collin M L . Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agrieuhural land use in Israel's Sharon region [J] . Journal of Environmental Management, 1998, 54: 39-57.
  • 10Quevauviller P, Sloot H A, Ure A, et al . Conclusion of the workshop: harmonization of leaching extraction tests for environment risk assessment[J] . Science Total Environmental, 1996, 178(123) : 133-139 .

二级参考文献213

共引文献411

同被引文献390

引证文献26

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部