期刊文献+

电子胃镜活检病理诊断伴幽门螺杆菌感染的胃黏膜上皮内瘤变的分析 被引量:20

Retrospective analysis on advantages and disadvantages of gastric endoscopic biopsy on pathological diagnosing gastric lesions with helicobacter pylori infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价电子胃镜活检病理诊断伴幽门螺杆菌感染的胃黏膜上皮内瘤变价值。方法 99例电子胃镜活检诊断胃黏膜上皮内瘤变,均有外科手术病理对照,分析影响电子胃镜活检准确性的因素。结果诊断为胃浸润癌的病例术前电子胃镜活检病理诊断为LGIN与HGIN的比例分别为7.4%(7/94)及68.1%(64/94),两者有显著差异(P<0.05)。相符组与不相符组比较,内镜分型Ⅱ型、肿瘤大小>2cm、肿瘤高中分化,是诊断准确性降低的因素。轻-中度胃炎,符合率为37.0%(20/54),重度胃炎,符合率为17.8%(8/45),两者有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论电子胃镜病理活检可以发现绝大部分的胃部病变患者。一次活检不能排除胃癌的可能。电子胃镜活检病理诊断为高级别GIN时,大多数情况下有更重病变的可能,内镜分型Ⅱ型、肿瘤大小>2cm、肿瘤高中分化,胃炎越重,胃镜活检与随访及外科手术病理符合率越低,密切随访及外科手术治疗可以弥补电子胃镜活检病理诊断的不足,最大限度地提高胃部疾病诊断准确性。 Objective To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of gastric endoscopic biopsy for the pathological diagnosis of gastric lesions with helicobacter pylori infection.Methods 99 cases received gastric endoscopic biopsy for the pathological diagnosis before surgical resection.The diagnose accordance rate of gastric endoscopic biopsy for the pathological and surgical resection were compared.Results Invasive gastric carcinoma existed in 7.4 % and 68.1% of cases which had been diagnosed low-grade GIN and high-grade GIN on gastric endoscopic biopsy,respectively (P<0.05).Endoscopic type Ⅱ(P<0.05) 、size of tumour more than 2 cm (P<0.05)and higher tumor differentiation (P<0.05) were found with reducing concordance rate of pathology.The concordance rate of mild and moderate gastritis was 37.0 % (20/54),which was significantly higher than the concordance rate of marked gastritis1 7.8 % (8/45) P< 0.05).Conclusion Gastric endoscopic biopsy for the pathological diagnosis could identify most gastric lesions,though invasive gastric carcinoma could not be excluded based on endoscopic biopsy only.When high-grade gastric lesions were identified by gastric endoscopic biopsy,endoscopic type Ⅱ、size of tumour more than 2 cm、higher tumor differentiation 、more marked gastritis are associated with the lower concordance rate of gastric endoscopic biopsy and regularly endoscopic examination、pathological diagnosis of surgical resection.Regularly endoscopic examination and surgical resection should be recommended to effectively make up for the disadvantages of gastric endoscopic biopsy and to improve the accuracy of diagnosis,for more severe lesions might exist in these cases.
出处 《中国实验诊断学》 2014年第3期380-383,共4页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis
关键词 胃黏膜上皮内瘤变 活组织检查 胃镜检查 Gastric intraepithelial neoplasia Biopsy Gastric endoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1周晓军,樊祥山.解读2010年消化系统肿瘤WHO分类(Ⅰ)[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2011,27(4):341-346. 被引量:96
  • 2I.eng WK, I.in SR, Ching J Y, et al. Factors PredictingProgresSion of grastris inteslinal meaplasia: results of arandomized tria I.on Helicobacter Pylorieradiction[J]. Gut, 2001. 53 (9) : 1244.
  • 3Hamilton SR. Aahonen I.A. World Health Organization elassifi cation of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumors of digestive system[M]. I.yon : IARC Press, 2000.
  • 4Dixon MF,Genta RM, Yardley J H, et al. Classification and grad ing of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. Intermtional Work- shop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1991[J]. Am J Surg Pathol,1996,20:1161.
  • 5Chang Kyun Lee, Kwun Chung, Suck- Ho Lee. et al. Is endoscopic forceps biopsy enough for a definitive diagnosis of gastric epitheli- al neoplasia [J]. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2010, 25: 1507.
  • 6徐峰.胃镜活检对胃黏膜高级别上皮内瘤变的诊断价值[J].占林医学.2011.1;33(3):602.
  • 7Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2005,55:74.
  • 8Everett SM, Axon AT,Marly gastric cancer in Europe[J]. Gut, 1997,41: 142.
  • 9Sargan I, MotocA, VaidaMA, et al. Anatomic and pathologica- laspects in the pathology of malignanl gastric tumors[J]. Rom Jmorphol Embryol,2006.47(2) : 163.
  • 10Molohiko K,Tsutomu N,Shusaku T,et al. Endoscopic subrau cosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia a muhicenter study by Osaka Universily ESD Study Group[J] Gastroent erol, 2011,46 : 325.

二级参考文献2

  • 1Hamilton S R,Aaltonen L A.World Health Organization classification of tumours of the digestive system[M].Lyon:IARC Press,2000:1-193.
  • 2Bosman F T,Carneiro F,Hruban R H,et al.World Health Organization classification of tumours of the digestive system[M].Lyon:IARC Press,2010:1-155.

共引文献95

同被引文献151

引证文献20

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部