期刊文献+

基于三维形貌特征的岩石节理峰值剪切强度准则研究 被引量:24

Peak shear strength criterion for rock joints based on three-dimensional morphology characteristics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 引入3个在一定范围内独立于测量尺度的三维形貌参数表征岩石节理形貌,并基于形貌参数建立了新的岩石节理峰值剪切强度准则。同时采用新准则和Barton公式计算了23对岩石节理的峰值剪切强度并与室内直剪试验结果对比,新准则的计算值与试验结果较为接近而Barton公式在一定程度上低估了节理剪切强度,表明新准则能更好地描述节理峰值剪切强度。新准则的三维形貌参数反映了不同形貌特征对剪切强度的贡献,物理意义明确,并且形貌参数可在一定范围内采用任意尺度测量,因而有利于新准则的工程应用。进一步分析表明:在规则齿形节理情况下,新准则可退化到Patton公式的形式,因而新准则实质是Patton公式的三维推广。 Three 3D morphology parameters independent of measurement scale within limits are introduced to characterize the morphology characteristics of rock joints, and a new peak shear strength criterion for the rock joints is developed based on the morphology parameters. Then, both the new criterion and Barton's criterion are adopted to calculate the peak shear strength of 23 pairs of rock joints. By comparing the calculated and tested peak shear strengths, the new criterion is proved to be more reasonable, while the peak shear strength calculated by Barton's formula is underestimated. The new criterion has a clear physical meaning because the contribution of different morphology characteristics to the peak shear strength is represented in detail by the three morphology parameters, and it is also convenient for the new criterion to be applied to engineering practice since the morphology parameters can be measured by any scale within some limits. Furthermore, the new criterion is essentially the generalized 3D form of Patton's criterion as it can be simplified to Patton's formula when applied to regular joints.
出处 《岩土工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期529-536,共8页 Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51079108) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2012206020208)
关键词 岩石力学 节理 峰值剪切强度 节理形貌 直剪试验 rock mechanics joint peak shear strength joint morphology direct shear test
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1PATTON F D. Multiple modes of shear failure in rock[C]// Proc First Congress of International Society of Rock Mechanics. Lisbon, 1966: 509-513.
  • 2BARTON N. Review of a new shear strength criterion for rock joints[J]. Engineering Geology, 1973, 7(4): 287-332.
  • 3BARTON N, CHOUBEY V. The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1977, 10(1-2): 1-54.
  • 4LADANYI B, ARCHAMBAULT G. Simulation of shear behaviour of a jointed rock mass[C]// The 11th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics(USRMS). Berkeley, 1969: 105-125.
  • 5SCHNEIDER H J. The friction and deformation behaviour of rock joints[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1976, 8(3): 169-184.
  • 6MAKSIMOVIC M. The shear strength components of a rough rock joint[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1996, 33(8): 769-783.
  • 7ZHAO J. Joint surface matching and shear strength part B: JRC-JMC shear strength criterion[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(2): 179-185.
  • 8KULATILAKE P, SHOU G, HUANG T H, et al. New peak shear strength criterion for anisotropic rock joints[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abastracts, 1996, 32(7): 673-697.
  • 9GRAASSELLI G, WIRTH J, EGGER P. Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2002, 39(6): 789-800.
  • 10GRASSELLI G. Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2006, 39(4): 295-314.

二级参考文献14

  • 1PATTON F D. Multiple modes of shear failure in rock[C]11 Proc First Congress of International Society of Rock Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 1966: 509 - 513.
  • 2VA'SA'RHELYI B. Influence of normal load on joint dilatation rate[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1998,31(2): 117 - 123.
  • 3BARTON N, CHOUBEY V. The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1977, 10(1): 1 - 54.
  • 4BEER A J, STEAD D, COOGAN J S. Estimation of the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) by visual comparison[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2002, 35(1): 65 - 74.
  • 5KULATILAKE PHS W, SHOU G, HUANG T H, et al. New peak shear strength criteria for anisotropic rock joints[J]. International Journal of-Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 1995, 32(8): 673 - 697.
  • 6GRASSELLI G Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description[D). Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2001.
  • 7BELEM T, HOMAND F, SOULEY M. Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2000, 33(4): 217 - 242.
  • 8GHAZVINIAN A H, AZINFAR M J, GERANMAYEH R. Importance of tensile strength on the shear behavior of discontinuities[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2012,45(3): 349 - 359.
  • 9SON B K, LEE Y K, LEE C I. Elasto-plastic simulation of a direct shear test on rough rock joints[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 2004, 41: 2A07.
  • 10COTTRELL B E. Updates to the GO-shear strength criterion[D]. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2009.

共引文献35

同被引文献187

引证文献24

二级引证文献133

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部