受歧视知觉对流动儿童社会融入的影响:中介机制及自尊的调节作用被引量：24

The Impact of Perceived Discrimination on Chinese Migrant Children's Social Integration: Mediator Mechanisms And Moderator Effect of Self-esteem

原文传递

导出

摘要研究以上海市437名流动儿童为被试,通过量表法分析了流动儿童从受歧视知觉到社会融入过程的影响因素及其作用机制。结果显示:(1)受歧视知觉作为危险性因素对流动儿童的社会融入产生了显著负面影响;(2)群体可渗透性在流动儿童的受歧视知觉和社会融入过程中起着部分中介作用,受歧视知觉既对社会融入产生直接负面影响,也通过群体可渗透性对社会融入产生间接影响;(3)个体自尊水平对群体可渗透性中介作用的发挥起到调节作用,群体可渗透性对流动儿童生活满意度的影响,随个体自尊水平的提升而增加。群体可渗透性对流动儿童的社会融入起着有调节的中介作用。 The research chooses 437 migrant children in Shanghai as subjects, using scale to study the influencing factors and medial mechanism in the process of migrant children＇ s social integration. The result indicates ：（ 1 ） as a risk factor, perceived discrimination has a negative effect on the migrant children＇ s social integration （their life satisfaction and identity fusion） ; （2） Group permeability has mediating effect in migrant children＇ s perceived discrimination and social integration , and perceived discrimination has both direct negative impact on social integration and indirect impact through group permeability; （3） Self-esteem can adjust the mediating effect of group permeability, whose impact rises as the level self-esteem does. Thus group permeability has adjustable mediating effect on the social integration of migrant children.

作者郝振崔丽娟

机构地区华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院上海外国语大学英语学院

出处《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期137-144,共8页 Psychological Development and Education

基金教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-10-0382) 上海市教育科学研究市级项目(B13011)

关键词流动儿童受歧视知觉自尊群体可渗透性社会融入 Migrant Children Perceived Discrimination Self-esteem Group Permeability Social Integration

分类号 B844.1 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献39

1Branscombe,N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77( 1 ) , 135 -149.
2Corning, F. (2002). Self-esteem as a moderator between perceived discrimination and psychological distress among women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49( 1 ) , 117 - 126.
3Ellemers, N., Van knippenberg, A., De Vries, N., & Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497 - 513.
4Filip, B. , & Norbert, V. (2000). Responding to membership of a low- status group: The effects of stability, permeability and individual ability. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 3( 1 ) , 41 -62.
5Garstka, T. A. , Schmitt, M. T. , Branscombe, N. R. , & Hummert, M. L. (2004). How Young and Older Adults Differ in Their Responses to Perceived Age Discrimination. Psychology and Aging,19 (2) , 326-335.
6Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1 - 10.
7Henri, T., & John, C. T. (1986), The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior, Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Second edition) , Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
8Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
9Mael, F. A. , & Ashforth, B. E. (1992) . Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizatiottal Behavior,13,103 -123.
10Major, B. , Quinton, W. , & McCoy, S. (2002) . Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 251 - 329.