期刊文献+

Weighted-Tau Rank:一种采用加权Kendall Tau的面向排序的协同过滤算法 被引量:3

Weighted-Tau Rank:a Ranking-Oriented Algorithm for Collaborative Filtering
下载PDF
导出
摘要 已知的面向排序的协同过滤算法主要有两个缺点:计算用户相似度时只考虑用户对同一产品对的偏好是否一致,而忽略了用户对产品对的偏好程度以及该偏好在用户间的流行度;进行偏好融合和排序时需要中间步骤来构建价值函数然后才能利用贪婪算法产生推荐列表。为解决上述问题:我们利用类TF-IDF加权策略对用户的偏好程度及偏好流行度进行综合考量,使用加权的Kendall Tau相关系数计算用户间的相似度;进行偏好融合与排序时则使用基于投票的舒尔茨方法直接产生推荐列表。在两个电影数据集上,本文提出的算法在评测指标NDCG上的效果要明显优于其他流行的协同过滤算法。 Most ranking oriented collaborative filtering (CF) algorithms have two limitations. Firstly, they only con- sider the accordance of user preferences but ignore the degrees and popularities of user preferences when computing user similarities. Secondly, an intermediate step is necessary to formulate the value function, for preference predic- tion and aggregation in greedy algorithms to derive recommendation lists. To address these problems, we propose a Degree-Popularity weighting scheme integrating TF-IDF to weight the degrees and popularities of user pairwise rela- tive preferences, and compute similarities between users based on weighted Kendall Tau rank correlation coefficient. Preference aggregations and predictions are directly formulated and the recommendation lists are consequently de- rived by applying the Schulze method. We conduct extensive experiments on two movie datasets under NDCG evalu- ation, implying advantageous results in comparison with the state-of-the-art CF algorithms.
出处 《中文信息学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期33-40,共8页 Journal of Chinese Information Processing
基金 国家自然科学基金(61272240 60970047 61103151) 教育部人文社科基金(12YJC630211) 教育部博士点基金(20110131110028) 山东省自然科学基金(ZR2012FM037) 山东省优秀中青年科学家科研奖励基金(BS2012DX012) 山东大学研究生自主创新基金(YZC12084)
关键词 协同过滤 面向排序 加权Kendall TAU 舒尔茨方法 collaborative filtering ranking-oriented weighted Kendall Tau Schulze method
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献96

  • 1Resnick P, lakovou N, Sushak M, et al. GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. Proc 1994 Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conf, Chapel Hill, 1994: 175-186
  • 2Hill W, Stead L, Rosenstein M, et al. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. Proc Conf Human Factors in Computing Systems. Denver, 1995:194 -201
  • 3梅田望夫.网络巨变元年-你必须参加的大未来.先觉:先觉出版社,2006
  • 4Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A. Expert-driven validation of Rule Based User Models in personalization applications. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2001, 5(1-2):33-58
  • 5Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2005, 17(6): 734-749
  • 6Rich E. User modeling via stereotypes. Cognitive Science, 1979, 3(4) : 329-354
  • 7Goldberg D, Nichols D, Oki BM, et al. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Comm ACM, 1992, 35(12):61-70
  • 8Konstan JA, Miller BN, Maltz D, el al. GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to usenet news. Comm ACM, 1997, 40(3) : 77-87
  • 9Shardanand U, Maes P. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating ‘Word of Mouth'. Proe Conf Human Factors in Computing Systems Denver, 1995: 210-217
  • 10Linden G, Smith B, York J. Amazon. corn recommendations: hem-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 2003, 7(1): 76-80

共引文献426

同被引文献9

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部