期刊文献+

冲突性话语中第三方采取的补救策略

Remedial Strategies Taken by the Third Party in the Critical Discourse
下载PDF
导出
摘要 礼貌现象是语用学研究的一个重要内容,然而使用礼貌原则对违反礼貌原则的冲突性话语分析仍有不足,因此库尔佩柏提出与布朗和列文森礼貌原则对立的不礼貌原则以及其回应框架。试以生活类栏目《非诚勿扰》为例,在礼貌策略与不礼貌原则的两个框架下,分析冲突性话语中第三方采取怎样的补救策略来应对冲突双方的紧张局势,旨在为改善人际关系提供一种良好的解决方案。 Politeness phenomenon makes an important part of pragmatics study .However the principles of politeness are far from satisfactory in analyzing discourse of impoliteness , therefore Culpeper proposed principles of impoliteness and a framework of its responses against the politeness principles put forward by Brown and Levinson .Based on the lifestyle program If you are the one , the study within the frame of politeness strategies and impoliteness principle explores what remedial strategies the third party intends to use in order to tackle the tension between the two sides in conflict .The study is dedicated to providing a useful solution to im-prove the interpersonal relationship .
作者 冯雪
出处 《鸡西大学学报(综合版)》 2014年第3期134-137,共4页 JOurnal of Jixi University:comprehensive Edition
关键词 礼貌策略 不礼貌原则 冲突性话语 《非诚勿扰》 politeness strategies principles of impoliteness If you are the one critical discourse
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1何自然,冉永平.语用学概论[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,2001.
  • 2刘国辉.言语礼貌·认知期待·语境文化规约[J].外语教学,2005,26(2):22-26. 被引量:41
  • 3Rudanko, J. Aggravated impoliteness and two types ofspeaker intention in an episode in Shakespeare' s Timon of Ath- ens [ J]. Journal of Pragmaties,2006, (38) : 829 - 841.
  • 4Brown, P. and Levinson, S. Politeness. Some Uni- versals in LanguageUsage [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1987.
  • 5陈明娟.礼貌原则运用中的性别差异[J].西安外国语学报,2005,13(3):20-23.
  • 6Culpeper, J. , Bousfield, D. , Wichmann, A. Impolite- ness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics,2003, (35) : 1545 - 1579.
  • 7Bousfield, D. Impoliteness in Interaction[ M ]. Amster- dam: John Benjamins Publishing Company,2008 : 86, 86, 93, 95.

二级参考文献29

  • 1顾曰国.礼貌、语用与文化[J].外语教学与研究,1992,24(4):10-17. 被引量:1148
  • 2Arndt, H.& R. Janney. Intergrammar: Toward an Integrative Model of Verbal, Prosodic, and Kinesic Choices in Speech[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1987.
  • 3Blum-Kulka, S. Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1987(11): 131-146.
  • 4Blum-Kulka,S.& G.Kasper. Politeness[J].a special issue, Journal of Pragmatics, 1990.
  • 5Brown, P & S. Levinson. Universals in Language Usage: Politeness phenomena[A]. In E. Goody (ed.). Questions and Politeness - Strategies in Social Interaction[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978: 56-310.
  • 6Brown, P & S. Levinson. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  • 7Davies, E. The English Imperative[M]. London: Croom Helm Ltd., 1986.
  • 8Escandell-Vidal, V. Towards a Cognitive Approach to Politeness[A]. In K. Jaszczolt & K.Turner, (eds.). Contrastive Semantics and Pragmatics, Vol. 2. Discourse Strategies[C]. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, 1996: 629-650.
  • 9Fasold, R. The Sociolinguistics of Language[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.
  • 10Fraser, B. Acquiring social competence in a second language[J]. RELC Journal, 1978, 9(2):1-21.

共引文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部