基于行业偏好的港口物流供应商多维度选择方法被引量：6

A Multi-dimensional Method for Port Logistics Supplier Selection Based on Industrial Preference

下载PDF

导出

摘要港口物流供应商选择是制造企业全球供应链管理的关键环节,决策者的感知不确定性会影响供应商决策绩效。结合结构方程模型(SEM)和数据包络分析(DEA)的特点,提出了一种基于行业偏好的港口物流供应商多维度选择方法——SEM/DEA法。这种方法以大量的行业样本数据为基础,根据行业偏好来确定不同指标维度的权重,可以减小单个决策者感知误差对选择结果的负面影响,提高港口物流供应商选择决策的理性程度。 Port logistics supplier selection is a key link of global supply chain management in man ufacturing enterprises. Decision-maker＇s perceived uncertainty affects supplier decision performance. By combining the feature of Structural Equation Modeling （SEM） and Data Envelopment Analysis （DEA）, this paper proposes a SEM/DEA sions. Based on a large number of industria of different indicators＇ dimensi impact of single decision-maker gree of port logistics supplier s on ＇S s accor method for selecting port logistics supplier in multi-dimen- 1 sample data, this method is used to determine the weights perceived g to industrial preference, which can reduces the negative bias to the result of selection and improves the rational de- elect decision.

作者傅海威曲林迟

机构地区宁波工程学院国际港口与物流研究中心上海海事大学经济与管理学院

出处《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期605-609,共5页 Chinese Journal of Management

基金国家社会科学基金资助青年项目(12CJY036)

关键词港口物流供应商选择行业偏好结构方程模型数据包络分析 port logistics supplier selection industrial preference structural equation modeling data envelopment analysis

分类号 C93 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1LIN Y K. YEH CT. Optimal Carrier Selection Based on Network Reliability Criterion for Stochastic Logistics Networks[J]. International Journal of Production Economics. 2010, 128(2): 510-517.
2BAE H. The Effect of Market Orientation on Relationship Commitment and Relationship Effectiveness of Port Logistic Firms [J]. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 2012. 280): 105-134.
3DAHEL N E. Vendor Selection and Order Quantity Allocation in Volume Discount Environments [J]. Supply Chain Management: An International J ournal , 2003, 8(4): 335-342.
4SIPAHI S. ESEN O. A Multi-Criteria Model for Bidding Evaluation: An Alternative Selection of the Best Firms for the Presentation of Istanbul [J]. Management Decision, 2010, 48 (2): 296-313.
5CHEN CT. LIN CT. HUANG S F. A Fuzzy Ap- proach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Supply Chain Management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics. 2006. 102 (2): 289-301.
6HAMDAN A. ROGERS K ]. Evaluating the Efficiency of 3PL Logistics Operations[J]. International Journal of Production Economics. 2008. 113 (1): 235-244.
7WOUTERS M. ANDERSON J C. NARUS J A, et al. Improving Sourcing Decisions in NPD Proj ects , Monetary Quantification of Points of Difference l ] ]. Journal of Operations Management, 2009, 27 (1) : 64-77.
8KAHNEMAN D. A Psychological Perspective on Economics[J]. American Economic Review, 2003. 93 (2): 162-168.
9KOUFTEROS X A, VONDEREMBSE M A. DOLL W ]. Intergrated Product Development Practices and Competitive Capabilities: The Effects of Uncertainty, Equivocality, and Platform Strategy[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2002, 20 (4): 331-355.
10TSIROS M, HEILMAN C M. The Effect of Expi- ration Dates and Perceived Risk on Purchasing Behavior in Grocery Store Perishable Categories [J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69 (2): 114-129.

二级参考文献4

1魏权龄,崔宇刚.评价相对有效性的几个重要DEA模型——数据包络分析(二)[J].系统工程理论与实践,1989,9(2):55-68. 被引量：62
2魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988.218-257.
3Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operations Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
4Cooper W W, Seiford L M, Kaoru Tone. Data Envelopment Analysis[ M]. Boston: Kluwe Academic Publishers, 2000.