期刊文献+

改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术后再次剖宫产术的临床效果分析 被引量:6

The Clinical Effectiveness Analysis of Cesarean Section Again about Post-operative of Modified Crosscutting Slight-scar Cesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术后再次剖宫产术的临床疗效,为临床推广做出指导。方法:选取120例既往行改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术(改良组)、134例既往行腹壁纵切口剖宫产术(腹壁纵切口组)、94例既往行新式剖宫产术后(新式剖宫产组)需二次剖宫产术的患者资料进行回顾性分析,对比观察三组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:改良组与腹壁纵切口组、新式剖宫产组比较,在腹壁、腹腔粘连、手术开始至胎儿娩出时间、手术总时间方面,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术术后腹壁、腹腔粘连发生率最低,腹壁纵切口剖宫产术次之,新式剖宫产最高,对可能需要二次开腹患者,首次剖宫产宜选择改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术。 Objective:To investigate clinical efficacy of on cesarean section again about post-operative of modified crosscutting slight-scar cesarean section,which made guidance for clinical application. Method:120 cases of accepted modified crosscutting slight-scar cesarean section(modified group),134 cases of accepted portrait-cutting(longitudinal incision group),94 cases of new type cesarean sections(new type cesarean sections group)were selected,and the patient’ clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical efficacy of two groups were compared. Result:There was statistical significance of differences in abdominal adhesion,delivery time and surgical time between the three groups(P〈0.05). Conclusion:The occurrence of abdominal adhesion from modified crosscutting slight-scar cesarean section cases is the lowest,portrait-cutting cesarean section is higher,and new type cesarean section is the highest. It is suggested to accept Modified crosscutting slight-scar cesarean section for those who need the second operation.
作者 陈安珍
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2014年第8期63-65,共3页 Medical Innovation of China
关键词 剖宫产术 改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术 腹壁纵切口剖宫产术 新式剖宫产术 妊娠 Cesarean section Modified crosscutting slight-scar cesarean section Portrait-cutting cesareansection New type cesarean section Pregnancy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献54

共引文献188

同被引文献44

  • 1张元英.对二次剖宫产产妇进行下腹纵切口常规子宫下段剖宫产手术的效果观察[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(12):213-214. 被引量:4
  • 2张小勤.剖宫产术后再次妊娠177例分娩方式分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(1):57-58. 被引量:262
  • 3杨桂莲.改良式腹膜外剖宫产术与传统腹膜内剖宫产术分析对比[J].医药前沿,2012,2(31):116-117.
  • 4韦燕.再次剖宫产96例三种剖宫产术式对比研究[J].中外健康文摘,2012,23(46):285.
  • 5Fl~sun A, Igde A.Vaginal birth after cesarean dehvery[J].Continuing MedEducJ, 2004, 13(4): 137-139.
  • 6Gozukara F, Eroglu K.Factors that affect the choices of primiparous on the mode of delivery[J].J Hacettepe Uni School Nurs, 2008, 22(1): 32-46.
  • 7Aslam M F, Gilmour K R, Fawdry D S.Who wants a cesarean section? A study of woman's personal experience of vaginal and cesarean delivery[J].JObstetGynaecol, 2003, 23(4): 364-346.
  • 8World Health OrganizatiomThe World Health Statistics report 2010 [Internet].2011. Available from: http://www, who.int/whosis/ whostat/2010/en/.
  • 9American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery[~].Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 104(1): 203-212.
  • 10Nielsen M D. Rupture and dehiscence of cesarean section scarduring pregnancy a'nd delivery[J].Obstet Gynecol, 1989, 160(3): 569-572.

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部