摘要
目的:探讨改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术后再次剖宫产术的临床疗效,为临床推广做出指导。方法:选取120例既往行改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术(改良组)、134例既往行腹壁纵切口剖宫产术(腹壁纵切口组)、94例既往行新式剖宫产术后(新式剖宫产组)需二次剖宫产术的患者资料进行回顾性分析,对比观察三组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:改良组与腹壁纵切口组、新式剖宫产组比较,在腹壁、腹腔粘连、手术开始至胎儿娩出时间、手术总时间方面,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术术后腹壁、腹腔粘连发生率最低,腹壁纵切口剖宫产术次之,新式剖宫产最高,对可能需要二次开腹患者,首次剖宫产宜选择改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术。
Objective:To investigate clinical efficacy of on cesarean section again about post-operative of modified crosscutting slight-scar cesarean section,which made guidance for clinical application. Method:120 cases of accepted modified crosscutting slight-scar cesarean section(modified group),134 cases of accepted portrait-cutting(longitudinal incision group),94 cases of new type cesarean sections(new type cesarean sections group)were selected,and the patient’ clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical efficacy of two groups were compared. Result:There was statistical significance of differences in abdominal adhesion,delivery time and surgical time between the three groups(P〈0.05). Conclusion:The occurrence of abdominal adhesion from modified crosscutting slight-scar cesarean section cases is the lowest,portrait-cutting cesarean section is higher,and new type cesarean section is the highest. It is suggested to accept Modified crosscutting slight-scar cesarean section for those who need the second operation.
出处
《中国医学创新》
CAS
2014年第8期63-65,共3页
Medical Innovation of China
关键词
剖宫产术
改进式横切口微痕剖宫产术
腹壁纵切口剖宫产术
新式剖宫产术
妊娠
Cesarean section
Modified crosscutting slight-scar cesarean section
Portrait-cutting cesareansection
New type cesarean section
Pregnancy