期刊文献+

肾及肾透明细胞癌多b值扩散成像的单双指数拟合比较 被引量:2

Comparison of fi tting degree in monoexponential and biexponential model used to assess multi b-value DWI of renal parenchyma and CCRCC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨一种更适合描述肾实质和肾透明细胞癌(clear cell renal cell carcinoma,CCRCC)的DWI信号强度随b值变化的数学函数模型。材料与方法通过回顾性分析32例CCRCC患者的影像学资料。参考常规图像,分别测量肾实质和CCRCC实质区的DWI信号强度,分别采用单、双指数函数的数学模型对DWI信号拟合。两种拟合方法间的比较采用Wilcoxon检验;两种组织间的比较采用Mann-Whitney检验。结果两种组织的DWI信号强度均随着b值的增大而减小。肿瘤实质区的单、双指数拟合度参数R2的中位数(75%区间)分别为0.97(0.96,1.00)和1.00(1.00,1.00),组间存在统计学差异(W=-253,P=0.00);肾脏实质的单、双指数拟合度参数R2的中位数(75%区间)分别为0.98(0.98,0.99)和1.00(1.00,1.00),组间存在统计学差异(W=-528,P=0.00)。两种组织间的R2都无统计学差异(U=301.5,P=0.26;U=253.0,P=0.05)。结论双指数函数模型比单指数函数更适合于描述肾实质和CCRCC的DWI信号强度随b值的变化规律。 Objective:To explore a more suitable mathematical model describing the signal change of renal parenchyma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) induced from DWI with several b values. Materials and Methods: The images of 32 cases with CCRCC was analyzed retrospectively. Base on the conventional sequences, the signal intensity of renal parenchyma and CCRCC were measured, and the trends of signal intensity with several b values were fitted using two methods respectively, including monoexponential model (Group 1) and biexponential model (Group 2), and the quantitative index R2 was calculated. The R2 was compared between two groups using Wilcoxon test and between two tissues using Mann-Whitney test. Results: The signal intensity of two tissues declined with increased b values. The R2 was shown as median (75% CI). In tumor, the R2 is 0.97 (0.96, 1.00) in Group 1 and 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) in Group 2, and a significant difference was found (W=-253, P=0.00). In renal parenchyma, the R2 is 0.98 (0.98, 0.99) in Group 1 and 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) in Group 2, and there is a statistical difference (W=-528, P=0.00). And there are no differences between two tissues using each exponential modal (U=301.5, P=0.26, U=253.0, P=0.05, respectively). Conclusion: The biexponential function is a more suitable mathematical model for describing the signal change of renal parenchyma and CCRCC on DW imaging with several b values.
出处 《磁共振成像》 CAS CSCD 2014年第2期102-106,共5页 Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:81371513) 常州市卫生局重大科技项目(编号:ZD201110)
关键词 磁共振成像 弥散 肾肿瘤 腺癌 透明细胞 Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Kidney neoplasms Adenocarcinoma,clear cell
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献57

  • 1李涛,高元桂,高育,文载律,梁燕.肾癌假包膜征高场MRI表现特征、病理基础及意义[J].中华放射学杂志,1995,29(11):781-783. 被引量:19
  • 2张劲松,宦怡,张光运,葛雅丽,孙立军,常英娟,赵海涛,杨春敏.扩散加权成像在脊髓梗死中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(12):1247-1251. 被引量:7
  • 3董柏君 张进 陈勇辉 等.上海仁济医院肾癌数据库资料分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29:222-225.
  • 4Delahunt B, Bethwaite PB, Nacey JN. Outcome prediction for renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of prognostic factors for tumors divided according to histological subtype. Pathology, 2007, 39 : 459-465.
  • 5Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, et al. The role of diffusion- weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR, 2001,22 : 1081-1088.
  • 6Lam JS, Klatte T, Breda A. Staging of renal cell carcinoma:current concepts. Indian J Urol, 2009, 25: 446-454.
  • 7Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC. Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol, 2004, 171 : 1066-1070.
  • 8Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol, 1982, 6 : 655-663.
  • 9Ghavamian R, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, et al. Renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney : an analysis of complications and outcome after nephron sparing surgery. J Urol, 2002, 168: 454-459.
  • 10Jiang J, Chen Y, Zhou Y, et al. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: contrast-enhanced ultrasound features relation to tumor size. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 73 : 162-167.

共引文献54

同被引文献40

  • 1黄备建,李丛,范培丽,韩红,袁海霞,金赟杰,王文平.超声造影在肾细胞癌亚型鉴别诊断中的价值[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(5):999-1007. 被引量:16
  • 2王喜军,史浩,赵华,许芳.MRI动态增强扫描在肾癌诊断中的价值[J].放射学实践,2006,21(9):941-944. 被引量:4
  • 3Womer KL,Kaplan B.Recent developments in kidney transplantation:a critical assessment.Am J Transplant,2009,9(6):1265-1271.
  • 4Schwarz A,Gwinner W,Hiss M,et al.Safety and adequacy of renal transplant protocol biopsies.Am J Transplant,2005,5(8):1992-1996.
  • 5Masin-Spasovska J,Spasovski G,Dzikova S,et al.Do we have to treat subclinical rejections in early protocol renal allograft biopsies?.Transplant Proc,2007,39(8):2550-2553.
  • 6Zhang JL,Rusinek H,Chandarana H,et al.Functional MRI of the kidneys.J Magn Reson Imaging,2013,37(2):282-293.
  • 7Chou SY,Porush JG,Faubert PF.Renal medullary circulation:hormonal control.Kidney Int,1990,37(1):1-13.
  • 8Fukuda Y,Ohashi I,Hanafusa K,et al.Anisotropic diffusion in kidney:apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for clinical use.J Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2000,11(2):156-160.
  • 9杨正汉,冯逢,王霄英.磁共振成像技术指南-检查规范、临床策略及新技术应用.北京:人民军医出版社,2014:263-264.
  • 10Le Bihan D.Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging:a wake-up call.Radiology,2008,249(3):748-752.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部