期刊文献+

公共图书馆服务质量评价模型构建与应用研究——基于Insync Surveys的视角 被引量:5

The Construction and Application Research of Public Library Service Quality Evaluation Model——Based on the Perspective of Insync Surveys
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借鉴Insync Surveys评价工具,结合公共图书馆特性,构建了6个维度25个指标的公共图书馆服务质量评价模型。以国内8家公共图书馆为调研对象,在验证调研数据及评价模型有效性的基础上,采用Insync Surveys的关注度/满意度测评工具从用户角度评价公共图书馆服务质量,找出服务工作的重心和急需改进服务项目,为深入研究公共图书馆服务质量影响因素、探索公共图书馆服务质量提升策略提供一定的参考和借鉴。 Reference the Insync Surveys evaluation tools, combining with the characteristics of public library,then construct the public li-brary service quality evaluation model with six dimensions and twenty-five indicators. Put eight domestic public libraries as the research object, after researching data and verifying effectiveness of the evaluation model, use Insync Surveys' attention / satisfaction measurement tool to evaluate public library service quality, identify service focus and items which need to be improved. Such conclusions could provide a certain reference and experience for further exploring on public library service quality influencing factors and improved strategies.
作者 施国洪 徐宁
出处 《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期182-186,共5页 Journal of Intelligence
基金 教育部人文社会科学基金一般项目"公共图书馆服务质量评价模型及方法研究"(编号:11YJA870021) 国家社会科学基金一般项目"移动图书馆服务质量影响因素与提升策略研究"(编号:13BTQ029)
关键词 InsyncSurveys 公共图书馆 服务质量 质量评价 insync surveys public library service quality quality evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献151

共引文献194

同被引文献82

  • 1李美文,林玉蕊.基于投影寻踪的图书馆评估模型及其应用[J].中国中医药图书情报杂志,2014,38(5):16-18. 被引量:3
  • 2黄宗忠.服务是图书馆的永恒主题——兼评国外图书馆服务的新理念、新方法[J].图书馆论坛,2005,25(6):22-29. 被引量:149
  • 3卫生部统计信息中心.中国医患关系调查研究:第四次国家卫生服务调查专题研究报告二[R].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2010:911.
  • 4insync Surveys [EB/OL]. 2013-09-13/2014-11-09. http://www. insyncsurveys. com. an/.
  • 5Susan S.Moving from evaluation to assessment[J]. Journal of the Medical Library Association,2014,102(4): 227-229.
  • 6Hamasu C, Kelly B. Assessment and evaluation is not a gut feeling: Integrating assessment and evaluation into library operations[J]. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2013, 101(2):85-87.
  • 7Montgomery S E. Library space assessment:User learning behaviors in the library[J]. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2014, 40(1):70-75.
  • 8Gustavson A. Using ILIAC to systematically plan and implement a library information literacy assessment program for freshman classes[J]. Public Services Quarterly, 2012, 8(2):97-113.
  • 9Sarah H C, Crystal K, Michael L,et al.Using qualitative assessment protocols to evaluate a new library discovery service: The testing protocols were not only useful for identifying problems with our discovery service implementation, but they were also useful for reporting those problems to the vendor[EB/OL].[2015-11-01].http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE|A350065756&v=2.1&u=lom_metronetmnfc&it=r&inPS=true&prodId=GPS&userGroupName=lom_metronetmnfc&p=GPS&digest=811a385babebc609a5a50fbcbcea0961&rssr=rss#.
  • 10Ziaei S, Nooshinfard F. Evaluation of central libraries' Websites of universities in iran from a marketing viewpoint[J]. Libri, 2012, 62(3):276-290.

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部