期刊文献+

三种同域分布喉毛花的繁殖分配 被引量:3

Reproductive allocation of three sympatric Comastoma(Gentianaceae) species
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以青藏高原高寒草甸中三种同域分布的喉毛花为研究对象,通过比较三个种的植株性状和繁殖分配,探讨繁殖分配的种间差异及其与植株个体大小的关系。结果表明:(1)三个种的植株高度、顶花大小和单株花数目、繁殖分配均存在种间差异,这可能与其各自的交配系统和具体的生境以及相应的生活史对策有关;(2)在三种喉毛花中,投入到营养器官和繁殖器官的绝对资源量均呈显著正相关,未检测到植株生长和繁殖间的权衡关系;(3)三个种的个体大小与繁殖器官生物量均呈显著正相关,而与繁殖分配均呈显著负相关,这表明个体越大,繁殖投入越高,而繁殖分配越低,与以往研究结果一致,这可能是由于繁殖分配与个体大小之间存在异速关系。 Resource allocation strategy is central to plant life-history theory and thus receive extensive attention of ecologists and evolutionists.However,there are few research about the resource allocation strategies of sympatric spe-cies of the same genus.We studied the plant traits and reproductive allocation of three sympatric Comastoma species which are all alpine annual herbs of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.Our results were as follows:(1)there were significant differences in plant height,flower number every plant,top flower size and reproductive allocation among three species due to their different mating systems,habitats and life-history strategies;(2 )in all three species,there was positive relationship between resource allocation of vegetative organs and reproductive organs,and no trade-off between vege-tative growth and reproduction was found;(3)the reproductive investment increased but the proportion of reproduc-tion(reproductive allocation)decreased with increased individual size,which was consistent with the previous conclu-sions,indicating size-dependency of reproductive allocation and this might be resultant from the allometric relationship between reproductive allocation and individual size.
出处 《广西植物》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期38-45,共8页 Guihaia
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2010CB951704) 国家自然科学基金(310703337) 中国科学院重要方向性项目(KSCX2-YW-2-1019)
关键词 喉毛花属 繁殖分配 生活史 个体大小效应 异速关系 青藏高原 Comastoma reproductive allocation life-history size-dependent effect allometric relationship the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Avila-Sakar G,Krupnick GA,Stephenson AG. 2001. Growth and resource allocation in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana:effects of fruit removal[J]. Intern J Plant Sci,162(5),189-195.
  • 2Bazzaz FA,Ackerly DD,Reekie EG. 2000. Reproductive Allocation in Plants[A]//Fenner M. Seeds:the Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities[M]. Oxford:CABI Publishing:1-29.
  • 3Bazzaz FA,Chiariello NR,Coley PD,et al. 1987. Allocating resources to reproduction and defense[J]. BioScience, 37(1):58-67.
  • 4Bonser SP,Aarssen LW. 2009. Interpreting reproductive allometry:Individual strategies of allocation explain size-dependent reproduction in plant populations[J].Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst,11(1):31-40.
  • 5Callahan HS,Pigliucci M. 2002. Shade-induced plasticity and its ecological significance in wild populations of Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Ecology,83(7):1 965-1 980.
  • 6Cao GX,Kudo G. 2008. Size-dependent sex allocation in a monocarpic perennial herb,Cardiocrinum cordatum (Liliaceae)[J]. Plant Ecol,194(1):99-107.
  • 7Cheplick,GP. 2005. The Allometry of Reproductive Allocation[M]//Reekie EG,Bazzaz FA Reproductive Allocation in Plants. London:Elsevier Academic Press:97-128.
  • 8Dafni A. 1992. Pollination Ecology:A Practical Approach[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press Hemborg AM,Karlsson PS. 1998. Altitudinal variation in size effects on plant reproductive effort and somatic costs of reproduction[J].Ecoscience,5(4):517-525.
  • 9Karlsson PS,Mendez M. 2005. The resource economy of plant reproduction[M]//Reekie EG,Bazzaz FA(eds). Reproductive allocation in plants. London:Elsevier Academic Press:1-49.
  • 10Karlsson PS,Svensson BM,Nordell KO. 1990. Resource investment in reproduction and its consequences in three Pinguicula species[J]. Oikos,59(3):393-398.

二级参考文献55

  • 1Lloyd D G. Allocation to pollen ,seeds ,and pollination mechanisms in self-fertilizing plants[J]. Functional Ecology, 1987,1 : 83-89.
  • 2Cruden W,I.lyon D. Patterns of biomass allocation to male and female functions in plants with different mating systems[J]. Oecologia (Berlin), 1985,66 : 299-306.
  • 3Morgan M T,Barrett S C H. Reproductive correlates of mating system variation in Eickhornia paniculata Solms (Pontederiaceae) [J]. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 1989,2 : 183-203.
  • 4Lovett Doust J, Cavers P B. Biomass allocation in hermaphrodite flowers [J]. Canada Journal of Botany, 1982,60 : 2530-2534.
  • 5Mekone M J. Sex allocation and outcrossing rate: a test of theoretical predictions using Bromegrasses(Bromus)[J]. Evolution, 1987,41 (3) : 591-598.
  • 6Schoen D J, Male reproductive effort and breeding system in a hermaphroditic plant [J]. Oecologia,1982,53:255-257.
  • 7Charnov E L. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 1979, 76: 2480-2484.
  • 8Zhang D Y. Resource allocation and the evolution of self-fertilization in plants[J]. The American Naturalist, 2000,155 (2) : 187-199.
  • 9Solomon B P. Sexual allocation and andromonoecy:resource investment in male and hermaphrodite flowers of Solanum carolinenee (Solanaceae) [J].American Journal of Botany, 1986,73 : 1215-1221.
  • 10Bell G, On the function of flowers[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences,1985,224: 223-265.

共引文献51

同被引文献68

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部