期刊文献+

6项血清肿瘤标志物的联合检测在肺癌诊断中的价值研究 被引量:13

The Combined Detection of 6 Tumor Markers for Diagnosis of Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨6项肿瘤标志物水平与肺癌不同病理分型及分期的关系及在肺癌诊断中的价值.方法:应用蛋白芯片技术检测不同临床分期的147例患者及150例健康对照组血清中的6项肿瘤标志物水平,并进行统计学分析.结果:鳞癌、腺癌、SCLC的6项肿瘤标志物检测水平高于健康对照组,CEA在SCLC组高于鳞癌组、腺癌组;铁蛋白、CEA、CA19-9、CA125在鳞癌、腺癌、SCLC的阳性率均高于健康对照组,NSE在SCLC组阳性率高于健康对照组,CA242在鳞癌、腺癌组高于健康对照组;铁蛋白、CEA、CA19-9、CA125在肺癌Ⅰ~Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期的阳性率均高于健康对照组;6项肿瘤标记物联合检测的敏感度(78.91%)明显高于单项检测的敏感度(分别为38.10%、57.82%、0.01%、61.90%、48.30%和14.97%).结论:6项肿瘤标志物的联合检测可明显提高肺癌诊断的敏感性,肿瘤标志物的联合检测对肺癌的诊断具有重要价值. Objective:To study the expression of 6 tumor markers in different pathological typies of lung cancer and explore the feasibility of its clinical application.Methods:The serum levels of 6 tumor markers were detected by protein biochip technology in 147 cases of lung cancer and 150 cases of normal control.Results:The levels of serum Ferritin,CEA,CA19-9,CA125 in all kinds of lung cancer patients were significantly higher than those in normal control.The expression level of NSE in SCLC and CA242 in squamous cell carcinoma,adenocarcinoma were significantly higher than those in normal control.The positive rates of Ferritin,CEA,CA19-9,CA125 in patients of different stages were higher than that in normal control.The sensitivity of combination detection(78.91%) were significantly higher than that of single item(38.10%,57.82%,0.01%,61.90%,48.30% and 14.97%, respectively).Conclusion:The combined detection of 6 tumor markers could increase the diagnostic sensitivity of lung cancer,it was proved to be useful for the diagnosis of lung cancer.
作者 马良 纪爱芳
出处 《长治医学院学报》 2014年第1期24-26,共3页 Journal of Changzhi Medical College
关键词 肺癌 肿瘤标志物 蛋白芯片 Lung cancer Tumor markers Proteinchip
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献56

共引文献199

同被引文献126

  • 1梁祥森,甘耐炎,吕凯,陈波.非小细胞肺癌组织中SP70的表达及意义[J].医学信息,2017,30(5):41-42. 被引量:1
  • 2杨婷,杨勤.肺癌血清肿瘤标志物的研究进展[J].中国药物与临床,2005,5(7):489-491. 被引量:11
  • 3杨拴盈,张王刚,孙秀珍,何积银,李雅莉,刘原,张洁,董西林,杨德昌.五种血清肿瘤标志物单个或联合检测在肺癌诊断中作用的初步评价[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2005,26(4):352-354. 被引量:16
  • 4Grunnet M, Sorensen JB. Carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer,2012,76(2) :138- 143.
  • 5Matsuguma H, Suzuki H, Ishikawa y, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers, including CEA, Cyfra21- 1, SCC, CA19-9, SCC, CA125, TPA, NSE, and SLX, in patientswith completely resected pathological stage I non-small cell lungcancer[J]. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts), 2007,25 (18 Suppl) :7681.
  • 6Homma S, Satoh H, Kagohashi K, et al. Production of CA125 by human lung cancer cell lines[J]. Clin Exp Med,2004,4(3): 139.
  • 7Mizuguchi S, Nishiyama N, Iwata T, et al. Clinical value of serum cytokeratin 19 fragment and sialyl-Lewis x in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg,2007,83(1):216-221.
  • 8Hirose T, Okuda K, Yamaoka T, et al. Are levels of pro- gastrin releasing peptide or neuron-specific enolase at relapse prognostic factors after relapse in patients with small-cell lung cancer? [J]. Lung Cancer, 2011,71(2): 224-228.
  • 9刘军,张树重常见血清肿瘤标志物及其联合检测对肺癌辅助诊断现状分析.中国美容医学,2012,21(z1):71-72.
  • 10Chu XY, Hou XB, Song WA, et al. Diagnostic values of SCC, CEA Cyfra21-1 and NSE for lung cancer in patients with suspicious pulmo- nary masses: a single center analysis. Cancer Biol Ther, 2011, 11(12) 995-1000.

引证文献13

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部