B超引导下经皮穿刺注射消痔灵液和无水乙醇治疗肾囊肿的疗效比较

The Comparison of the Efficacy between Xiaozhiling Injection and Anhydrous Ethanol Percutaneous Injection Therapy on Renal Cysts under the Guidance of B-mode Ultrasonography

目的比较B超引导下经皮穿刺注射消痔灵液和无水乙醇治疗肾囊肿的临床疗效。方法选取2007年6月至2011年6月间进入我院接受肾囊肿治疗的患者60例,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组包括30例患者。对照组患者给予B超引导下经皮穿刺注射无水乙醇治疗,观察组患者给予B超引导下经皮穿刺注射消痔灵液治疗。结果观察组患者的总有效率为93.33%,对照组的总有效率为90.00%,两组患者的总有效率之间相互比较结果无显著性差异(P>0.05)。观察组共有10例患者出现不同程度的不良反应发生,不良反应的发生率为33.33%,明显低于对照组的18例,60.00%(P<0.05)。结论 B超引导下经皮穿刺注射消痔灵液和无水乙醇治疗肾囊肿的疗效无显著性差异,但是消痔灵液不良反应少,值得在临床中推广应用。

Objective To compare the efifcacy between xiaozhiling injection and anhydrous ethanol percutaneous injection therapy on renal cysts under the guidance of B-mode ultrasonography. Method 60 patients with renal cysts were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group. The patients of the observation group were given the percutaneous injection therapy with xiaozhiling injection under the guidance of B-mode ultrasonography. The patients of the control group were given the percutaneous injection therapy with anhydrous ethanol under the guidance of B-mode ultrasonography. Results The total efifciency of the observation group was 93.33% and the total efifciency of the observation group was 90.00%. There was no difference between the two groups （P〉0.05）. The incidence of adverse reactions of the observation group was 33.33% and it was obviously lower than that of the control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion There was no difference between the therapy of xiaozhiling injection and anhydrous ethanol. Xiaozhiling injection had less adverse reactions and deserved promotion.