摘要
目的:比较传统手术、小切口微创手术治疗小儿疝气的临床疗效及安全性。方法:选取我院2009年4月至2012年10月收治的90例疝气患儿作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法随机分为治疗组与对照组各45例,分别给予小切口微创手术和传统手术治疗,比较两组患儿手术疗效及各项指标。结果:治疗组术中出血量、手术时间、自主活动时间及住院时间均显著少于对照组(P<0.01),具有统计学意义。治疗组患儿术后并发症共计5例,并发症发生率为11.1%;对照组患儿术后并发症共计14例,并发症发生率为31.1%。治疗组患儿术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组(X2=15.248,P<0.01),具有统计学意义。结论:小切口微创手术治疗小儿疝气具有创伤小、恢复快、术后并发症少等优点,值得推广应用。
Objective:To compare the clinical effects and safety of traditional surgery and small incision minimally invasive operation in treatment of children hernia .Method:90 children with hernia in our hospital from Arp.2009 to Oct.2012 were selected as the research object ,by the way of random number table , they were divided into treatment group and control group , with 45 cases in each group respectively , they were treated with minimally invasive operation and traditional operation , curative effect and the operation indexe were compared between the two groups .Result:Amount of bleeding during the operation , operation time , independent activity time and hospital stay in treatment group were significantly less than those in the control group ( P&lt;0.01 ) , There&#39;s statistical significance .Among treatment group , the postoperative complications were 5 cases, the complication rate was 11.1%;among the control group , the children with postoperative complications were 14 cases, the complication rate was 31.1%.The treatment group in the incidence of post-operative complications was significantly lower than the control group (X2=15.248, P&lt;0.01), with statisti-cal significance .Conclusion:The small incision minimally invasive operation in treatment of infantile hernia has the advantages of small trauma , quick recovery , fewer complications , It is worthy of popularization and application .
出处
《河北医学》
CAS
2014年第3期476-478,共3页
Hebei Medicine
关键词
传统手术
小切口微创手术
疝气
小儿
疗效
安全性
Traditional operation
Minimally invasive operation
Hernia
Children
Effica-cy
Safety