摘要
通常认为,结构语义学理论是将索绪尔的结构主义延伸至语义领域而产生的。本研究尝试揭开"结构主义语义学"的第一个谜:语义场理论的形成过程及其学术背景。根据文献梳理:(1)伊普森(1924)首次提出语义场理论,魏斯格贝尔(1927)进一步加以阐述;特里尔(1931)提出的聚合场和波尔齐希(1934)提出的组合场,构成了完整理论;(2)马赛克模式和星状模式是语义场的两个典型模式;(3)心智语义场产生的学术背景是新洪堡特主义、民族心理学思潮和格式塔心理场论。因此,我们认为,心智语义场理论本质上是"新洪堡特主义语义学",而不是"结构主义语义学"。
It is generally considered that structuralist semantics is the result of the extension of Saussure' s structuralism to semantic field. The current study aims to solve the first maze of "structuralist semantics" that how the semantic field formed and what' s the base. Three main points are clarified through organizing literature : ( 1 ) It is Gunther Ipsen (1924) who raised "semantic field (Bedeutungsfeld)" for the first time. Leo Weisgerber (1927) richened this notion by giving further explanations and it was not completely established as a theory until the appearance of Jost Trier' s paradigmatic analysis ( 1931 ) and Walter Porzig' s syn- tagmatic analysis (1934). (2) "Mosaic" and "star-like conception" are two typical models in the theory of semantic field. (3) Neo-Humboldtianism, ethnopsychology and gestalt are the bases of the theory of semantic field. The nature of mental semantic field in German semantics is Neo-Humboldtian rather than Saussurean structuralism.
出处
《外语学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期35-44,共10页
Foreign Language Research
基金
江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"现代汉语元语言系列词典"(2010JDXM022)的阶段性成果
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助