期刊文献+

隐喻理解加工中概念构建的内在理路及其作用机制研究 被引量:2

The Construction of On-line Concept and the Cognitive Mechanisms Involved during the Understanding and Processing of Metaphors
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文介绍隐喻理解加工过程中概念构建的词汇语用过程,着重阐述3大研究范式对此的解释,即范畴涵括模型、词汇语用学解释以及Recanati的词汇阐释模型。隐喻理解加工既要应用已习得概念,又涉及新概念的构建,即临场概念,这是一个经词汇编码概念的"窄化"与"宽化"的语用调整结果。"宽化"使得词汇编码概念的一个或者更多的逻辑或者定义属性被"摒弃";"窄化"则相反,词汇编码概念的一些百科属性被"提升"为概念的逻辑或者内容组成成分。本文指出,"提升"与"摒弃"本质上是词汇焦点属性的激活问题,是认知机制即强化与抑制机制作用的结果。概念构建的3大研究范式对隐喻理解加工的洞察具有开创性。从概念构建入手研究隐喻的理解加工将打破自亚里士多德以来视隐喻为隐含比较的学术传统,学术动向值得关注。 This article examines the on-line construction of ad hoc concept during the understanding and processing of metaphors by centering on the explanations from three research paradigms: The class-inclusion model, the account of lexical pragmatics and Recanati' s lexical account. Metaphor comprehension involves both the use of previously acquired concepts and the creation of new ones, -- the ad hoe concepts. The ad hoc concept results from concept broadening and concept narrowing, -- a general pragmatic process of concept adjustment. In terms of concept broadening, one or more of the logical or definitional properties are dropped, while as for concept narrowing, some encyclopaedic property is promoted to the status of a logical or content-constitutive component. Scholars maintain that all this can be understood in terms of degree of activation of the properties of words in focus which demonstrates the effectiveness of two general cognitive mechanisms, -- suppression and enhancement. Explanations from the three research models have offered important insights into metaphor understanding and processing.
作者 吴诗玉 杨枫
机构地区 上海交通大学
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期45-52,共8页 Foreign Language Research
基金 上海交通大学文科特色研究项目"二语隐喻理解加工中概念构建的内在理路及加工障碍研究" 教育部人文社科青年项目"外国留学生汉语阅读中的超读障碍研究及iSTART策略应用"(10YJC740103)的阶段性成果
关键词 临场概念 宽化 窄化 抑制 强化 ad hoc concept broadening narrowing suppression enhancement
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献104

共引文献54

同被引文献38

  • 1束定芳.论隐喻的运作机制[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(2):98-106. 被引量:392
  • 2王慧莉,隋丹妮.基于潜在语义分析的长时工作记忆在语篇理解中的作用[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2005,18(4):66-68. 被引量:5
  • 3杨小虎.语言理解中的抑制机制研究综述[J].当代语言学,2005,7(4):327-337. 被引量:24
  • 4张威,王克非.口译与工作记忆研究[J].外语与外语教学,2007(1):43-47. 被引量:37
  • 5Blumenfeld, H. & V. Marian. 2011. Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension [J]. Cognition 118: 245-257.
  • 6Cameron, L. & G. Low (eds.). 1999. Researching and Applying Metaphor [C]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 7Carston, R. 2010a. Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images [J]. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Soceity 110.. 293-321.
  • 8Carston, R. 2010b. Lexical pragmatics, ad hoc concepts and metaphor: A relevance theory perspective [J]. Italian Journal of Linguistics 22 : 1-28.
  • 9Clahsen, H. & C. Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing in language learners [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 27: 3-42.
  • 10Gernsbacher, M. 1990. Language Comprehension as Structure Building [M]. Hillsdale, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum.

引证文献2

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部