从法定证据失权到酌定证据失权的嬗变——对新《民事诉讼法》第65条的思考

Evolve from Loss of the Right of Legal Evidence to Discretionary Loss of the Right of Evidence——Think of Article 65 of the new Civil Procedural Law

遵循"客观真实"的法制传统,我国一直以来没有证据失权的相关规定。直至《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》的颁布,实质意义上的法定证据失权制度才得以确立,但其适用的严格受到各方诟病,以致等同虚设。2012年新修订的《民事诉讼法》对此进行了修改,确立了酌定证据失权制度。它有利于缓和实体公正和程序公正,促进诉讼与发现真实之间的冲突,是证据立法的一大进步。以此为视角,借鉴域外立法,对我国酌定证据失权的具体适用予以分析,以期该制度能够在司法实践中顺利运行。

Follow the ＂objective truth＂ of legal traditions, our country has been no evidence of loss of the right of the relevant regulations. Until ＂certain provisions on Civil Evidence＂ was promulgated, the real sense of the evidence of loss of statutory rights system was established, but it applies strictly criticized by the parties, that is equivalent to the dummy. In 2012, The newly revised ＂Civil Procedural Law＂ which were modified, loss of the right to establish a system of discretionary evidence, it helps to ease substantive justice and procedural fairness, promoting litigation and discovery real conflict , the evidence of the legislation is a big step forward. Against this background, drawing extraterritorial legislation,evidence of loss of the right of discretion to be applicable to the specific analysis, so that the system is able to run smoothly in the judicial practice.